Verona Roma, 3-0 at the table for the Diawara case



[ad_1]

The sports judge established a 3-0 at the table in favor of Verona over Roma (0-0 the result of the match): the decision after the error of the giallorossi club, which did not include Diawara in the list given to the League thinking that he was still back among the Under 22s (who can play regardless of whether they are on the roster or not). Actually, the player turned 23 in July and from this year is an Over 22. Roma have 7 days to appeal, the club’s lawyers are already at work.

The season of the new does not start in the best way Rome by Dan Friedkin. the sports judge, after the error with Diawara in compilation of the list delivered to the Lega Serie A, established the defeat at the table (0-3) of the Giallorossi club against Verona. Sports justice has therefore rejected the defense of the Capitoline company, which still has 7 days to appeal. The club’s lawyers are already working.

Sports judge statement

read also


Juric fined: took Verona from the stands

“Taking into account that the Roma club has signed a player not registered on the list of 25 communicated by certified email on September 14, 2020 at 12.14, despite having become an Over 22 – read the statement from the sports judge – decides to sanction Roma with the sports penalty of losing the game by 0-3 “.

The Diawara case

read also


Three bars but zero goals, the same between Verona and Rome

The sports judge therefore applied the regulations, as happened with Sassuolo in 2016 for a very similar case. On September 14, Roma handed over the championship list to Lega Serie A. The list, which can have a maximum of 25 players, had 4 seats available and did not have Diawara. The Guinean midfielder, until last season, had always been part of the Under 22, who can play even if not on the list. But in the meantime, the player turned 23 on July 17 and has thus become an Over 22.: Rome should have added it to the list, but they didn’t. And Diawara played 89 minutes at the unlisted Bentegodi. A “mistake in good faith”, the company justified itself, still having 4 places on the list, it could have included Diawara without sacrificing anyone. But the sports judge applied the legislation. And so Roma started with a defeat at the table, if the resource allowed.

[ad_2]