[ad_1]
There is confidential information from the Vatican Gendarmerie dated June 20, 2013 that highlights negative reputation elements against financier Raffaele Mincione. A document that the Secretariat of State of the Holy See decided to ignore, addressing him to investand hundreds of millions of euros in real estate transactions and investments abroad. These are the minutes of the main prelates involved in the investigations carried out by the promoters of justice of the Vatican Gian Piero Milano and Alessandro Diddi in this river of money stolen from the coffers of the Church and used for personal purposes, which have already caused the resignation of Monsignor Angelo Becciu, to tell of the war that has taken place in recent years within the office that instead must protect his interests and yet he acts in accordance with the instructions of the Pope.
At the center of the checks is the purchase of 60 Sloane Avenue building in London, but actually reading the documents collected in the last year it is clear that the investment was only the pretext for what the researchers themselves define a well-planned maneuver to carry out a Massive looting of financial resources from the Secretary of State. that has no equal. Fifteen people have ended up being investigated for embezzlement, abuse of authority and corruption – employees of the Secretary of State and arrangers – but the protagonists are undoubtedly Becciu himself and Monsignor. Alberto Perlasca, noted as the true supporter of investment who – perhaps out of fear of being arrested or in any case of having serious consequences – has decided to collaborate with the promoters by launching against Becciu. Both should clarify what advantages they have obtained taking into account that between The controls carried out are those of the accounts opened in the IOR., but also in Italian and foreign banks where the income from the business concluded using the offer of San Pedro and other availabilities of the Holy See could be merged. But it also explains why it was decided to use repairmen and bankers as consultants, paying them fees of hundreds of thousands of euros. A long list of personalities who in the last seven years seem to have gone to the Secretary of State with the greatest ease and without any kind of control.
Committed funds committed
In the report on the seizure of current accounts in the name of Monsignor Perlasca, the Vatican investigators write: The investigations made it possible to verify that for the conclusion of the London operation, the Secretary of State resorted to a complex financial structure created through the promise of restricted funds instead of through the direct use of liquid assets, the so-called Lombardo Credit, which in the opinion of this office represents strong circumstantial evidence that this structure has represented a ploy not to make visible, as in fact happened for many years, the distraction achieved. Since June 2013, at least four meetings have been held within the Secretary of State, which have been attended by fixers and bankers interested in distributing the millions of euros that -with the endorsement first of Monsignor Tarcisio Bertone and then of Monsignor Becciu – it was decided to use it in the real estate business or otherwise divert it to foreign accounts. But the decisive one seems to have occurred on June 20, 2014, when Monsignor Perlasca meets Mincione and especially Patrizia Crassus, the Credit Suisse executive who had brought Mincione to the Vatican and during which the decision, considered disastrous for the Vatican’s finances, was made to start the operation in London. The investigations made it possible to verify that the decision to carry out this operation would be assigned to the competent General Affairs Section by the Secretary of State.
The warning from the judiciary
Among the first to be questioned is Vincenzo Mauriello, one of the Vatican employees investigated. The promoters write: On January 13, 2020 this office listened to Mauriello, who, regarding the London operation, reported that “in 2013-2014 while he was in front of the office of deputy Monsignor Becciu, he met Dr. Fabrizio Tirabassi (also investigated, ed) leaving the substitute’s room. On that occasion he told him that the Secretary of State planned to make an investment but the Deputy requested, before proceeding with the investment, to acquire information about one of the partners that Tirabassi told him was Raffaele Mincione ”. Mauriello, according to himself, personally supervised the acquisition of information on Raffaele Mincione by contacting the Gendarmerie, which, in a report signed by Dr. Alessandrini, highlighted the reasons that would have The start of investment activities with the mentioned Mincione is not recommended. In particular he “He was not a morally suitable person to have relations with the Secretary of State“. Mauriello specified that in 2013-2014 the person who had decided to initiate the investment for which the procedure was Monsignor Perlasca. Mauriello’s statement finds a precise confirmation as found, in particular that Monsignor Perlasca has followed the London operation since the principle having signed on July 9, 2014, together with Fabrizio Tirabassi, the proposal for the participation of the Secretary of State in the investment that has seen the use of limited-purpose funds for speculative purposes.
This is how the Nunciatures managed
On January 31, he is cited, also as a suspect and an employee of the Secretary of State, Monsignor Mauro Carlino. The promoters write: In addition to reviewing the role and functions of Tirabassi, it specifies the position of absolute importance held by Monsignor Perlasca who “was in charge of everything that has to do with the administration, the semi-annual financial statements of the Nunciatures, but also of the economic results of the different income and expense centers such as those of the San Pedro donation. ”From the statements of Monsignor Carlino it can be deduced that Monsignor Perlasca had total control of the management of the Athena Capital Global fund and especially of the administration, defined by himself “Harmful”, personal and with serious fund losses, operated by Mincione. Monsignor Carlino reported that the current Substitute Monsignor Edgar Peña Parra, in January 2019, realizing the seriousness of what was happening, told him that the responsibility for the deleterious management of the investment should be attributed to Monsignor Perlasca and that he had decided keep it out of investment recovery operations. Perlasca began to collaborate with the Vatican authorities and according to reports from theDnakronos would have revealed Monsignor Becciu’s request to transfer money to his brothers’ activities through Caritas and that he himself Becciu served during his tenure as a journalist transmit information on Monsignor Battista Ricca, Monsignor Edgar Pena Parra, on the illness of Cardinal Parolin, on the birth of the Mater Olbia hospital. Last chapter of a war that seems to be far from over.
October 1, 2020 (change October 1, 2020 | 07:30)
© REPRODUCTION RESERVED
[ad_2]
