There will be a provision for Christmas, dinners only with small groups ”. The undersecretary denies Conte – Libero Quotidiano



[ad_1]

You remember that Giuseppe Conte, When in the tele-barker version did you promise us that you wanted to save Christmas from the coronavirus? Dinners for all, freedom, let’s hug and let’s fly good. Well more lies. At least according to the Undersecretariat of Health, Sandra Zampa of the Democratic Party, in an interview with La Stampa destined to go down in history. When it is pointed out that if contagions slow down, Christmas could become a “replica” of last summer, or “all passionately together” and the consequent risk of a third wave, this is where La Zampa clearly says: “There will be a provision that will affect Christmas. It must be said that it does not have to be a lonely Christmas, but that families, first-degree relatives, brothers and sisters can gather in the small nucleus. Most of the current restrictions should be maintained, perhaps with a relaxation of the rigor for some exercises ”, he emphasizes. The truth is that La Zampa, first, denies Conte and, second, it has already decided with whom we can spend Christmas. By law. By decree. For dpcm. In short, it does. “Only close relatives, first degree, brothers and sisters.” Disturbing. Things from the Soviet Union.

They lock us up, but in the German style: confirmation, lockdown (for everyone?).  Salvini's fury: the end of a country

But not only. Because the undersecretary is asked if, by any chance, they have made errors in communication by the government, as people these days seem to underestimate the danger. What are you doing? She responds by accusing the Italians: “I am amazed at the lightness with which in many parts of Italy people go out for walks without a mask. And I find it scandalous that people sit for hours in bars with the excuse of having coffee, at nearby tables. “Yes,” scandalous “the fact that people sit next to each other following the rules, or at different tables. Chills upon chills.” no more than two people can enter and I don’t see controls and sanctions ”, he adds. And again: “A minimalist narrative has passed and many scientists and many politicians have not helped to maintain the necessary rigor,” he concludes. always because of others. And Merry Christmas, but only with whoever you say.

Self certification?  Not necessary, but .... Dpcm, fans in disarray: the puzzling explanation of the leg.  So who stays home?



[ad_2]