[ad_1]
“I didn’t even want the news to come out, I prefer not to talk about it anymore: I don’t care, that’s why I don’t comment on it in any way.” The lawyer seems saddened Carlo Taormina following the news of the foreclosure of the house in Cogne where little Samuele was murdered in 2002. The court of Aosta in fact, he agreed with the former lawyer of Annamaria Franzoni and rejected the requests for suspension of the real estate foreclosure, presented by Franzoni herself and her husband Stefano Lorenzi. The measure was activated after the non-payment to Taromina, by its client, of the pack or pack for the defense of the trial for murder of the minor. Franzoni, who has already completed his 16-year sentence, owes his former lawyer more than 275,000, but now 450 thousand, between interest and revaluation, in the seizure deed. “This is a story that has caused me too many efforts, too much pain. That’s why I don’t like to talk about it, don’t let me add anything else ”, said Taormina while recounting. The Republic.
Annamaria Franzoni believed that the lawyer would help her free of charge and, in any case, she certainly did not expect that the bill to defend her at least until part of the second-degree trial for the crime of little Samuele would be that high. To the cottage in the village Montroz she, on the other hand, has always remained very close. She returned there several times after returning to freedom after the 16 years in prison to which she was sentenced. She no longer lived there, but she and her husband never thought of selling it. In 2009, around her they formed a capital fund and on this basis they asked the judge to stop the foreclosure of their home by the lawyer. In other words, the villa could not have been foreclosed because it is part of an endowment fund. However, for the judge called to rule on the issue, this is not the case. As always explains The RepublicFor the Aosta magistrate, there was a clear link between the intention of the fund and that of the legal assistance received at the time from Taormina to demonstrate that both had the same purpose, linked to the “needs of the family.”
What happens now? “The house can go to auction because the process with this decision has not been suspended – said Giorgio Taormina, who assists his father in the process – but if the other party intends to go ahead on the merits, surely the case can continue, even to the Supreme Court. 30th of October The possibility of selling the property will be discussed.
[ad_2]
