The revelation in these “signs” “I tell you who Meloni really is”



[ad_1]

What emerges from the letter of the president of Fratelli d’Italia, Giorgia MeloniIt is the vital force that, together with the determination with which it is endowed, is expressed in decision-making without, however, making use of direct and aggressive verbal confrontation, which makes those who adopt it little credible. The contrast with the opponent occurs instead through reasoning that allows him to express forcefully what in his opinion seems correct. Therefore, Meloni could be compared to another female hero: Joan of Arc. Giorgia Meloni does not use halftones or halftones. His round and fluid calligraphy indicates, in fact, ease in relationships managed with good self-control (see curved gestures, marked pressure and soft folds of the literal axes).

Serena declares “I am right” and expresses her ideas clearly and decisively, but never aggressive. His tone of voice is firm and firm, demonstrating a leadership and a political culture that would serve to bring our country out of mediocrity, giving those who believe in his politics security and, why not, even hope. The confidence that he exudes is captured graphologically in a large, easy-to-carry signature, an indicator of strong will and firmness of spirit. The exaggerated size of the first letter of the signature expresses the introjection of an important and very significant fatherhood for her. Therefore, the writing reveals who the leader of FdI really is. In Meloni there is a strong need to feel useful and this acts as a stimulus and satisfies him personally, as he is able to exploit all his rich political and human heritage. In fact, Meloni shows significant political depth. Although she does not have an easy-to-understand personality because contrasting forces coexist and balance: an exquisite femininity on the one hand and an almost masculine determination on the other. She pours this way of being into politics and thus, even with the fiercest opponents, manages to be objective and tolerant, keeping criticism within the limits of impartial positivity (clear and essential writing). He sets an example for all of us on how to fight shared participation for what we believe in, without implications or misunderstandings.

[ad_2]