[ad_1]
“The minister Azzolina you must resignand “To put it plainly is Massimo Arcangeli, professor at the University of Cagliari and president of the subcommittee that promoted the Minister of Oral Education for the contest as director.
The professor, in an interview with True, also published by Dagospia, he tells theexam talking about Lucía Azzolina, remembering how, in general, in her career she didn’t “I never met such unsuspecting candidates: I signed up blunders Language gaps and unsustainable for those who want to be directorsFor example, Arcangeli explains, “a candidate, not Azzolina, did not understand what was being asked of her. In the end we realized that he had no idea what a square root was. He claimed that he had never seen that symbol“.
The minister’s examination does not appear to have been much different in reality: “Took insufficient in English, 5 and zero in computing. To the question consisting of several questions, he did not answer badly, he did not answer at all. But he knew the rules and oral, computer science and English had a relative weight in the trial.“.
And on the publication or not of the tests of the contest for the director, the professor specifies: “I sympathize with the applicants. Must be returned public all the evidence, even more so that of the minister. As did the Ministry of Justice for the magistrate contest – even the sub judice – who decided to exhibit the evidence. The obstinacy and arrogance of the Ministry and the Minister of Education, despite the opinions of the TAR, of not allowing the candidates and everyone to verify the results of the competition, I believe that they are not something from the Third but from the Fifth world.“.
Arcangeli, however, does not expect Azzolina to publish her evidence: “The minister is denying the evidence in all her actions.“And he explains:”I reported plagiarism and am investigating other aspects. I counted at least 42 steps Copy in his first and second level thesis and support teaching qualification. He never responded except by denying the evidence. We are talking about a constant action of denial of evidence, of lack of transparency. I repeat it without problems“.
For this reason, the teacher is convinced that Azzolina is not suitable to play the role of Minister of Education: “Should Give up or at least give now a guarantee of that transparency that he has never guaranteed since he took office“.
