[ad_1]
This Milan-Naples One episode, above all, was impressed in the eyes of fans and viewers: Bakayoko play Hernandez, which falls to the ground. An alleged contact, which took place in ’87, in which a fundamental decision was spoiled, that of rigor, and the referee’s evaluation of the development of the match. Easter. Reviewing the scene it would seem that there is contact, even if it is of doubtful amplitude: in slow motion it may be more rigorous than on the pitch, but the touch is there.
Milan-Napoli, Bakayoko-Hernandez contact: Easter referee
When the box explodes the referee is well positioned, but does not blow the whistle and at the first interruption (strong foul by Follow, continue its Osimhen, punished with yellow) is recovered on the monitor by Where from colleague Mazzoleni.
An intervention in itself already extremely anomalous with respect to the protocol, because Easter seems to be in perfect control of the action. But the expert Mazzoleni believe at that juncture that there was a questionable choice.
Mazzoleni’s intervention: the Easter referee does not award the penalty
Even more puzzling, however, is the decision of Easter Do not assign the penalty after the review: generally the referee corrects himself, because he evaluates a contact that was lost live, precisely through the support of the images. No penalty for Milan and the Naples di Gattuso closed the game with three points.
The question is legitimate, at this stage of the championship and in light of the practice that is consolidating on the use of Where: I know Easter He had already rated the episode without missing any of the action, why send it to the monitor?
VIRGILIO SPORT | 03-15-2021 09:05
