[ad_1]
Perhaps the right thing to do at this point would be to change your name. After the Pope of Citizenship Income, Luigi Di Maio, published in the newspaper a substantial self-criticism about the arrangement of the flag of the Five Star Movement (I think it is convenient to rethink some mechanisms) we can say that the son no longer exists. At least with the characteristics described at the time. And then even that pompous quote referring to the French Revolution would be worth dropping. And he accepts that it is called minimum income, like almost all the other brothers in the world. At the time of their conception, the egg-headed crickets wanted income to have two goals, the fight against poverty and activation in the labor market. Behind was the idea of rewrite social democratic welfare by paving the way for occupation for the entire population in relative poverty, about 15% of Italians. The lack of work was in fact seen as the main cause of poverty, without understanding how the Great Crisis of 2008-15 had changed the cards with the advance of the figure of the working poor, salaried workers who cannot reach the famous fourth week.
To attempt the operation, the initial allocation provided by the 5 stars was 16 billion, partly provided directly and partly intended to strengthen employment centers. Those who criticized from the beginning the double objective of the fight against poverty and unemployment were covered with insults and had to swallow the distortion of the active policies planned for the unemployed and the birth of sailors. This is how the Grillina reworking of the Italian welfare system took shape, originally signed by Nunzia Catalfo, current Minister of Labor and entrusted to the young professor Pasquale Tridico and an Italian-American named Mimmo Parisi. This initiative had an element of strength: it crossed the laziness of the left and the union, which despite having an enviable roots and tradition in Italy, had forgotten the latter (except to repent in extremis under the pressure of the Alliance against poverty) . ).
There is a distance between saying and doing even for populists. And although the 5-Star Movement won the elections, in the end a coalition government was born and even the Northern League had the need to maintain faith in the promises of the electoral campaign. The result was that the resources to be distributed in the social network were used in part to income and in part to finance the quota measure 100 and so the 16 billion that the Grillini had dreamed of became 6 with the addition of the 2 billion of “little” Rei, inherited from the Gentiloni government. But in addition to going through the Northern League, the 5 Stars had to experience first-hand that the populist myth of the alternation of Castes in power with the Honestos is not equivalent to a magic wand, who goes to the control room faces many of the problems they had plagued. the predecessors.
Specifically, if the Employment Centers had not worked until then, Di Maio was not enough in the government to turn them into “Germans”. And then, if anything, the reforms need time, their implementation cannot be bowed to political calculations just because there is an electoral campaign on the horizon to say that they have abolished poverty. But even in this case, the 5-star rating was betrayed by the country’s ignorance: to truly improve labor balances, it is not enough to change the supply, but rather to act on the chronic weakness of the demand for labor, it is necessary to get dirty hands and deal with the market and trading options. Possibly not as Di Maio himself wanted to do with the Dignit law, an orphan provision that no one claims anymore and that has complicated the already difficult flows of youth employment.
As if that were not enough, even in the middle of the trip the Income has encountered other obstacles. A network of friends has not been built, we might say. And for one more lack of political culture of the 5 Stars who did not know the complexity of the levels of government in the Italy of the Fifth Title. Municipalities and Regions that should have been associated with the extraordinary operation to rewrite the welfare of Western countries, have gotten in the way or have not found the right links. And finally the spoils of the double objective that had driven the meager income. Calculating that 1.1 million families benefited for a total of 3.1 million people, some 200,000 Italians found a job opportunity – it is not known if independently or by placement, for what time and if they are still employed -. A result that the grillini themselves considered little usable in the consensus market in the final phase of the legislature. Hence Di Maio’s unexpected self-criticism: the grillinis have discovered that society is not as they had thought it to be and that administrative and technical culture is not a toy for conservative bureaucrats.
