[ad_1]
During this period of uncertainty, you really have several doubts about your state of health. In fact, especially if you are young, you may have the doubt that you are asymptomatic and that you continue to spread the virus.
There is only one way to discover your positivity: make sure with a test. To clarify many doubts in this regard, today we answer these questions. What is the difference between molecular and antigenic buffer? What is the best?
The antigenic swab
Today we explain the difference between molecular and antigenic buffer. What is the best?
This question must first be answered by clarifying the characteristics of each of the two. The antigenic swab is the one that provides the fastest response, ensuring a result within the day.
It is so named because it searches for antigens, which are the surface proteins of the coronavirus. It is done by taking a sample from the nasopharyngeal system, then inserting a cannula into the nose.
The molecular buffer
Molecular swabbing is performed following the same procedure, but looking for different substances within the bucco-nasal cavity. In this case, in fact, the result is not based on proteins, but on fragments of the genetic material of the virus.
While this method is the most reliable, it takes the longest to develop results. In short, it is better to do the antigen when you need to quickly find out if it is positive or not. While in case of cure it is better, instead, to opt for the molecular buffer.
Therefore, the difference between molecular and antigenic buffer is explained. And which is the better of the two was said in the course of this study.
Therefore, we recommend that you take a look at all our articles on coronavirus. Here, for example, is what indicates the three objects that should absolutely be kept at home during the pandemic.
(We remind you to carefully read the warnings in this regard, which you can consult WHO”)
