The defense of Rome: an oversight in good faith. But that League email …

Tomorrow, in all probability, will be the day that Roma will lose the match in Verona 3-0 at the table due to non-inclusion in the Over de Diawara list. The Giallorossi club is silent for now, but intends to appeal once the procedure is formalized. Roma, net of discontent because all this coincides with Friedkin’s first referee, will focus on good faith and the lost benefits of the error, hoping that it will be enough since the regulation is clear.

Strategy

–

Roma will obviously admit the error of form, but will say that it was an oversight in good faith because there was no need, possibly, to disappoint the League, as they have spaces for players over 22 and have them too. enough. Not only that: from Trigoria they will argue that the inclusion of Diawara in the field despite not being on the list did not bring benefits, because in his place no other player was included, young or not, so Bentegodi’s team it would have been the same even if Diawara had been included in the Over list. Finally, it is necessary to check if the League, it seems, has sent a pec to Rome to notify the error before the game. If this were the case, and the Giallorossi club had not seen it, the (already low) chances of winning the appeal would be further reduced. Even in this, however, Trigoria’s stitched mouths.