[ad_1]
Something went wrong at some point. And now we have to understand what: if it was a mistake by Napoli, who misinterpreted the rules. Or if the blue club has discovered a flaw in the memorandum of understanding between the FIGC and the government. The fact is that Gattuso and his team did not go to Turin, and now they run the risk of losing the big game against Juve 3-0. But let’s go in order.
Positive elmas and ASL indication. The afternoon opens with good news: all the swabs made have given negative results. But four results are missing and one arrives on time: Elmas is positive. It is the second case among Azzurri players, after that of Piotr Zielinski. But that is decisive. Because, while the Neapolitans are about to embark for Turin, they receive a note from the ASL: the health authority puts almost the entire group of the team in fiduciary isolation (for example, the famous injured and the Milik who is leaving are missing ). There is no explicit ban on the trip to Turin, but the Neapolitans believe they cannot leave.
Juve: “We are in the field.” And the League does not postpone. The first official reaction is that of the Juventus club. Also in fiduciary isolation after two positive cases in the external squad, Juventus announces that it will appear regularly at the Stadium at 8:45 p.m. After a couple of hours of silence, the confirmation of the Serie A League arrives: the match is scheduled as planned, without postponements. If Napoli does not appear, they will risk 3-0 at the table: the League does not say so, but it is the “normal” consequence of the rules. And the Sports Judge will decide on this point, then the FIGC.
Was it a qui pro quo? From Naples, until now, absolute silence. Sources inside the club let it be known that, if defeated at the table, the subsequent appeal will come. The central issue is to understand how the ASL communication fits into the framework of the protocol developed by the government and by the football federation itself. Even in case of fiduciary isolation, in fact, professional teams can suspend it for the time necessary for the dispute of the match, undergoing tests and smears before and after the match. Until now (it happened to Milan for example) the univocal interpretation is that the suspension also covers the trip. And at that point, less of a trip last minute towards Piedmont, the 3-0 at the table will be almost evident. But if this were not the case, history would have uncovered a nerve in the agreements between the FIGC and the government. As if to put at risk the continuation of the championship, whose second day, however, is already conditioned by the progression of the contagion. It will take the next few hours to figure out which of the two is the correct answer.
[ad_2]
