[ad_1]
Articles 110 and 319 are mentioned in the warranty notice on the Uruguayan sham exam
There would also be the crime of concurrence in corruption in the accusations imputed to the rector of the University for Foreigners of Perugia in the framework of the criminal investigation of the famous “farce exam” (expression used in the authorization order of yesterday’s raids by the Chief Prosecutor of Perugia, Raffaele Cantone) by Luis Suarez. In the warranty notice, informs Ansa, articles 110 and 319 are cited to the rector Giuliana Grego Bolli, and the latter describes the crime of conspiracy in corruption, sanctioning whoever “receives money or other benefits or accepts the promise to make a act contrary to their official duties “. The notification does not refer to a specific event, but the Perugia prosecutor’s point of view would be the organization of the extraordinary “ad hoc” session of Suárez for reasons considered inconsistent.
INTERMEDIARIES
–
So far, the order had disputed the crimes of “ideological falsehood” and “revealing official secrets,” but investigators have clearly broadened the spectrum of the investigation to the point of possible corruption. Among the topics to be explored, the role of some potential “middlemen” or “middlemen”. The starting path of history is also being ascertained, which was born at the initiative of Juve to initiate the procedures for Suárez’s passport, in recent weeks the club’s target of signings. But Lieutenant Colonel Selvaggio Sarri yesterday ruled out undue pressure from the company against the university personnel in charge of managing the exam to acquire the b1 level of knowledge of the Italian language, a prerequisite for obtaining citizenship. The rector was questioned yesterday by the prosecutors denying any irregularity and explaining that the procedures were organized with correctness and transparency.
September 23, 2020 (change September 23, 2020 | 4:36 pm)
© REPRODUCTION RESERVED