[ad_1]
“Paratici is interested”. This is the name that comes from the wiretaps that have upset the University for Foreigners of Perugia and have focused on the ‘farce’ exam that Luis Suárez took to obtain a certificate of knowledge of the Italian language at level B1 for assume the title. national citizenship. Paratici, Fabio Paratici, is the manager of the Juventus technical area who is mentioned in the conversations that the men of the Fiamme Gialle listen to in the days when everything has to be prepared so that the Barça forward – approved to the bianconeri- reaches your destiny informed enough to appear unblemished, instructed on questions and topics, covered in the answers
Everything goes according to plan: in just under half an hour the “gunman” (nickname he has carried from Liverpool) finds his diploma in his pocket, smiles and shakes hands with the commission’s professors, poses for a photo and then going home. No one imagined what would happen a few days later. No one knew that the Guardia di Finanza agents attended that test, noting the excitement of those hours and the conversations between the top management of the University.
“Called”, the name of Paratici in the interceptions
And then that “call” – counted by Republic in reference to the manager of the ‘old woman’ – fuels the interest of investigators in the matter. It is one more piece of the mosaic to reconstruct the chain of events and contacts that involve not only the professors investigated (Professor Lorenzo Rocca) but also the general director (Simone Olivieri), the director of the Center for Language Assessment and Certification. (Stefania Spina), the rector of the University of Umbria (Giuliana Grego Bolli) and the person who wrote the certificate (Cinzia Camagna). The accusations made against her are false ideology and disclosure of official secrets.
Because the reference to the Juventus coach arises
What would have been the role of Fabio Paratici? It is mentioned in other phone conversations but the nature of the alleged interest is not yet clear. And it should be clear that now, neither he nor Juventus itself are under investigation. Did he really champion the player’s cause? No, based on current findings. In the records there are no direct telephone calls or direct relationships between Paratici and components of the University that allow us to suppose such a thing, if not continuous insinuations of the people intercepted to the recommended attention for the examination process. Suggestions, not concrete findings. An attention, in fact, of which there is no trace except in these dialogues and which is not enough to foreshadow an involvement in the investigation.
Skepticism about the Suarez operation
At the end of the day, it was the Juventus coach himself who clarified that the opportunity to have Suárez at Juventus would have been excellent but it was the bureaucratic times linked to obtaining the community passport by the player and the formalization of the purchase by October 5 (last day of the transfer market). In short, Paratici was very skeptical about the possibility that the negotiation – also weighed down by the lack of economic agreement on the termination between the player and Barcelona – would be successful.
This also explains why around September 15 (2 days before the exam session before the date initially set 22) Suárez is basically told that Juventus will not sink the blow or go further in the transaction for the transfer a Black white. It is also at this juncture that the name of Professor Stefania Spina arises. The woman who would have prepared Suárez before the test lets out: “He found out that Juve no longer wants him.”
The investigation and the planned crime hypotheses
It remains to be shown that there was also corruption, also considering the other aspects and the other figures involved in the investigation. In the conversations, in fact, the possibility also arises that the Italian courses follow “other players”. A kind of return utility in exchange for the favorable treatment reserved for Juventus. Why do researchers make these assumptions? These are deductions derived from other interceptions, this time relating to the lawyer Maria Turco of the Chiusano law firm.
In this regard, the woman issued a long press release in which she denies that there has been an agreement or even a negotiation with the senior management of the University: “I put the Suárez staff in contact with the University. This contact activity is found in the emails between the player’s entourage and the university body, in which, as a courtesy, the undersigned is in copy but not addressee. clearly stated that the examination procedure was carried out in the presence and without any treatment. My words regarding the reference “to other players” are to be construed as procedural knowledge to be used for future cases. No agreement, no negotiation “.
The FIGC Prosecutor’s Office also investigates
And Juventus? He is not formally involved from a criminal or sporting point of view despite the fact that, in the latter case, the federal prosecutor Giuseppe Chinè has asked the Perugia judiciary to acquire the investigation documents. What are the Bianconeri risking? The hypothesis against could be the violation of art. 32 of the FIGC code: “Anyone who tries or directly attempts to perform or allows others to perform acts aimed at obtaining false or altered citizenship certificates or documents to circumvent the rules of entry into Italy and the registration of non-EU citizens is sanctioned.”
[ad_2]
