Suárez case, Paratici’s name appears: Juve was in a hurry to sign the player – La Stampa



[ad_1]

SHIPPED TO PERUGIA. Did Juventus try to bribe the leaders of the University for Foreigners of Perugia to organize a sham test in support of Luis Suárez? And who materially organized the test? The lawyer María Turco? Or is there someone else behind her? There are new interceptions that would embarrass one of Juve’s top managers, Fabio Paratici, who would not be investigated. “Promote Suarez” would be the consideration, not to mention the advice, that Paratici would have made with Maurizio Oliviero, rector of the state of Perugia. The latter, on the phone with his almost namesake Simone Olivieri, general director of the University for Foreigners of Perugia, would have thus supported the promotion of the Uruguayan forward: “You have to help him.” Oliviero and Olivieri are Juventus fans and in their conversation Perugia’s interest in supporting the Juventus club arises. For the moment, the only ones who have received a guarantee notice for competition in corruption are the rector of the University for Foreigners of Perugia Giuliana Grego Bolli and Simone Olivieri. But obviously a question arises because wherever there is a suspect of corruption, there must be an alleged corrupter. Who then is the corrupter?

Suarez, scam exam: shock wiretapping

The prosecutor headed by Raffaele Cantone, former head of Anticorruption and the Economic-Financial Police Unit of the Yellow Flames are working to understand if there has really been a corruption work, of which there is currently no evidence, or if it is instead of a case of psychological submission of the university towards Juve and the Uruguayan striker. The Turkish lawyer categorically rejects any hypothesis of corruption and reiterates that she has not requested any preferential lane.

Suárez case: that is why the FIGC has opened a file

The rector Giuliana Grego Bolli and the general manager Simone Olivieri, meanwhile, were challenged with articles 110 and 319 and the latter qualifies the crime of competition in corruption, sanctioning whoever “receives money or other benefits or accepts a promise to make a act contrary to their official functions “. The guarantee notice does not refer to a specific fact, but the organization of the special ad hoc session for Suárez is in the sights of the Perugia prosecutor. Investigators are also continuing to investigate for evidence to support the official secret and alleged false disclosure allegations from the player-backed evidence. Which consisted in the description of two scenes of family life (a mother helping her son with homework and a couple in the supermarket) and in listing the different habits of Uruguay and Italy. The attacker was also asked to ask a hypothetical neighbor in Italian where to go on a Sunday trip. All piloted. At least according to researchers and researchers.

Suárez case: this is what the people involved risk

But it does not end there: the Prosecutor’s Office of the Football Federation has opened a file on the farce examination supported by Luis Suárez. The chief prosecutor of the Football Federation, Giuseppe Chinè, also asked for the investigation documentsend of the ordinary judicial power of Perugia. For now, Suárez is not risking anything from the point of view of ordinary justice, because his position is configured in the case of those who benefit from a crime committed by other people. However, the fate of the University managers and professors is different. The rector of the university, Giuliana Grego Bolli, the general director Simone Olivieri, the examiner Lorenzo Rocca, Stefania Spina, the professor in charge of preparing Suárez for the test, and Cinzia Campagna, who had the task of preparing the B1 level certificate for the Uruguayan forward.

Suarez case, the irony of the web: “However, he chewed Italian well”

Investigated for false ideology in public deed and disclosure of trade secrets, for the first crime they risk a sentence of 1 to 6 years, for the second 2 to 5 years.

Much more serious would be the corruption hypothesis, by Grego Bolli and Olivieri, which provides for a prison sentence of 6 to 10 years. For the five suspects there is also the risk of suspension of activity at the university. The Ministry of University and Research is considering sending inspectors to Perugia and a disciplinary investigation could be launched soon.

Suárez, Lieutenant Colonel Sarri: “Juventus contacted the university. The university was looking for prestige”

[ad_2]