[ad_1]
The controversy over Abyss’s arbitration is not abating. Journalists and fans attack each other
The day after Rome-Turin the hot tempers have not yet calmed down. For fans of grenades (and not only) the red a Singo after 14 minutes that influenced the game and affected the victory of the Fonseca team. Controversy arises in social networks due to the lack of Espinazzola which cost Giampaolo’s side the second yellow card. According to the journalist and Inter fan Fabrizio Biasin, this is a warning: “Frankly exaggerated”. Those who reply to the tweet are not of the same opinion: “Hammer blow to the foot and ankle. Should the leg have been removed? “.
On Twitter there is a real debate, so much so that this morning the word Espinazzola is one of the most jokes on social media. The ironic Romanists joke us: “It is Leonardo who sought contact with the tacos, he had to be warned by simulation …” There are those who are serious when it comes to simulation: “Players should stop pretending. And what is the Var for? “. Someone tries to use common sense, drawing attention to the facts: “After the foul Singo did not protest, he apologized and came out with his head down”.
The journalist Maurizio Pistocchi also tries to make himself heard: “The double yellow card was indecent and Bremer’s foul on Dzeko was non-existent. Respect for the Bull ”. The episode of rigor also generates debate. “It’s an Abyss hat-trick and the club is silent,” says a bitter Granada fan. And according to someone: “It is Dzeko who opens his leg and seeks contact”. The images seem to say something else, but the social debate continues.
[ad_2]
