[ad_1]
In Lazio me Puglia me directors they stand sideways to the schools reopening in attendance of January 7th. Because, they argue, the offer of public transport it is still inappropriate to allow what is necessary distancing and the entire burden of reorganization, including schedules, falls precisely on the institutes. And in Lazio they find the side of the Lazio regional health advisor, Alessio D’Amato, that in an interview with Delivery courier questions the government: “With this growing data, I call for careful thought about reopening the high school on January 7th. They must remain closed throughout Italy. It would be extremely unwise in this phase of the epidemic to reopen in a week ”. In Puglia, on the other hand, the Region is considering an extension of the controversy order that allows parents to choose whether to send their children to school or have them follow a distance.
Bonaccini: “There is concern on the part of the Regions” – “I think it would be correct that the government in the next few hours meet again and together we make a decision, in a very secular way ”, says the president of Emilia-Romagna and the Regions Stefano bonaccini, at Rg3. “Yes there are concern, widespread in the country, which may still pose a risk, in light of the figures that exist, we eventually meet and discuss. And we also understand what the government thinks, since I have also heard expert voices that the government uses to make decisions that later concern the scientific part ”. The governor recalls that “we were in favor“In the reopening” because the students of this country, especially high school ones, are paying a very high price. In many European countries if not all schools had never closed ”. Now, however, the President of the Regions continues: “I agree with the worries of my colleagues, especially I took charge, as President of the Conference of the Regions, when we, as Emilia-Romagna, were ready to open at 75%, to take into account that most regions asked to exit more cautiously at 50%. And this was the agreement reached a few days ago with the government ”.
Directors: “Nobody listens to us” – For his part Antonello Giannelli, president of the National Presidi Association, interviewed by Corriere della Sera me Print emphasizes: everyone says “that school is central”, but “when deciding how to change it to adapt it to the Covid emergency, no one feels the need to listen to the world of school, to understand what the needs of teenagers. ” We must “take into account all the right needs of teachers and staff. So we hope to continue at 50 percent until the end of January. ” There are provinces “where the plans have been made by listening to the school as well, and the solutions work. In other places like a Rome, where the school has not been heard, there is critical issues. But in principle it was a good idea not to make national rules as in the past valid for all realities, but to decide province by province how to proceed ”. Among the most criticized points the beginning of the school day at 10: “Half of Italian high school students attend a technical or vocational institute: they are at least 6 hours a day. The organization of your life will be altered. They leave at 4.30 in the afternoon, without having eaten, take a bus or a train, come home hungry at six in the afternoon. What time will they do their homework? At 21 … “. The teaching” will have to take into account the change in schedule. Tasks, I would say that there will be few. If we had stayed in double shift between 8 and 9, these problems could have been solved. “
Lazio – For the Lazio councilor, D’Amato, the question is national: “The problem is for the whole country. Great prudence is needed, we are in the most delicate phase of the pandemic, we have three winter months ahead and we will be immersed in a complex vaccination campaign. The problem is not the classroom lessons – continues – but all that move school, all that tour Around the school. Thinking of going out in high school when we register more than 20 thousand cases a day does not make sense ”. Not only: “The data we are seeing is the effect of the infections that occurred ten days ago, coinciding with the christmas shopping he movements between regions. It takes more days to understand whether there will be a settlement or if it will grow again ”.
For his part, the president ofNational Association of Directors for Lazio Mario rusconi warns: “Schools in Lazio will not reopen if institutions interested in transport, health and public order do not guarantee what they are responsible for. Till the date the transportation plan is still missing. D’Amato affirms that secondary schools cannot return on January 7 because he knows that Lazio cannot guarantee the necessary security conditions for the reopening ”. So, despite “we have always been for the attendance of students in presence, not in dad”, we need “some conditions: distances in class, prophylactic measures provided by Cts and that public transport is adequate and functional. Having the children come in at 10 means move departure at 4pm, get home at 5.30-18pm ruining the day of our adolescents from a physiological and study point of view. Also, in Lazio and in the south central, unlike other regions, we do not yet have a detailed transport plan, that is, there is no information on transport schedules. Maybe the boys can be left in laze on the street waiting for the start of the lessons? “In addition, Rusconi attacks,” in Rome we were not listened to as school leaders. In Milan and its province, on the other hand, yes: there they have included the school entrance times and the transportation plan in a global project for companies, offices, shops. In the capital this was not done. The fact is that as long as we act alone at school, the restart will be impossible ”.
Puglia – In Puglia, the Regional Councilor for Education, Sebastiano Leo, will convene in the first days of next week a meeting with the office of the school and the unions, which will also be attended by the Councilor for Health, Pierluigi lopalco, and the Councilor for Transport, Anita Maurodinoia, to take stock of the situation. The Apulian prefectures have adopted operational plans following the instructions from Rome and are preparing for the return of students in groups, with different entry and exit times. Among the hypotheses, it cannot be ruled out that the Region, also considering the epidemiological situation that sees a very slow decline in infections, may decide expand the ordinance that gives parents the possibility to decide between face-to-face and distance education.
The ANP has requested a “very urgent” meeting with the President of the Region Michele Emiliano and the councilors of Health, Transport and Education. “We do not hide our disappointment – says the president, Roberto Romito – with the substance of most of the decisions made by the participants in tables among which schools were not included, although they are public administrations endowed with functional and organizational autonomy ”. Romito speaks of “disappointment and strong concern” over the fact that the prefecture to have “having recognized the substantial rigidity of the offer (transportation ed) and, therefore, have Discharged to the schools the exclusive burden of modifying their application by diversifying the entry and exit times in two shifts, which was imposed on them by the different prefectural resolutions ”. For this reason, the perverse pattern that we have been denouncing for months is repeated: transportation (and health, and school construction) do not adapt or improve significantly, or postpone such events for the future; schools, on the other hand, today as yesterday and tomorrow, must adapt, with the total disruption of your organizational structure, painstakingly achieved in months of uninterrupted work, in the midst of infinite and changing regulations, standards and protocols. For the ANP, “diversification into two shifts opens up more problems than it solves.” The association, on the other hand, proposes that 50% of students return to school with a single shift, however, extending distance learning for a few days and moving the return to January 15 or 18 to give time to organize. We proposed it to the different regional ‘tables’, the last of which was held on December 30, which, however, were not present, to our disappointment, precisely because of the representatives of the Puglia Region ”.
[ad_2]
