[ad_1]
the U.S have officially activated a plan sanctions against Turkey, due to the acquisition in 2017 of Russian S-400 missile system, paid for by Ankara 2.5 billion dollars.
The decision of the executive headed by Donald trump could create strong tensions with Erdogan, not only in bilateral relations between the two countries, but also internally NATO, at the risk of pushing the Turkish head of state towards a future alliance with Putin.
The United States, however, has been determined, arguing that the decision to buy the S-400 from Moscow could jeopardize its safety. Atlantic pact.
Accusations firmly rejected by Turkish government officials, who claim to be willing to react harshly to Washington’s measures.
United States: sanctions against Turkey activated
Sanctions imposed by the Trump administration worry the agency of the Turkish defense industry, with President Ismael Demir and three other officials to whom he will address denied entry to the US., also blocking their assets that they may possess under the jurisdiction of the US.
Furthermore, most export licenses are prohibited, along with blocking loans and credits for the Turkish organization.
These options are certainly not to the liking of Erdogan and his Government, with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs that qualifies the American attitude as inexplicable and asks Washington to withdraw the unjust measures against it.
Ankara Foreign Affairs Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu later stated how the sanctions will negatively affect the two states’ relations and that Turkey will find its own way to respond.
His Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov also strongly condemns the decisions of the state, pointing out that this is yet another display of arrogance toward international law that the United States has resorted to for years, without distinction between governments of the right or the left.
NATO Alliance at Risk?
However, even within US national borders there are some opinions that oppose action against Turkey, not so much because of the legitimacy of the decision, but rather for the time being.
In fact, there are those who argue that by mid-December, this foreign policy dossier could have been left in the hands of president-elect Joe Biden, ready to take office in the White House on January 20.
In this way, the new presidency would have ensured the first-hand management of such a complex issue, without running the risk of having to face strong tensions of an inherited situation with what, after the US itself, is the second country in terms effective. armed within NATO.
