[ad_1]
Roberto Saviano explains the reasons for his not to cut parliamentarians. And, in an interview with La Stampa, he launches a blow at the Democratic Party. To those who ask him to explain the reason for his tweet against Zingaretti and the Democratic Party, he explains:
″ Because you cannot bear it any more than those who have no position on anything and justify their existence for 25 years, first against Berlusconi and then against Salvini. Outraged when they are in the opposition and leaving everything unchanged (to better manage power) when they are in government. Is this politics? It seems to me the art of surviving ″
The writer referred to some lies from dem. In the interview he explains what he was referring to:
″ The first and foremost is the radical change in migration policies. The Libyan drama is so enormous that only history can do justice to the immense suffering of human beings that we prefer to “manage” by paying directly to their executioners.
Then he enters the merits of the vote on September 20 and 21, when, in addition to the municipal and regional elections, the constitutional referendum on the court of parliamentarians will be held:
“Can I say something? This referendum is very special and to explain it to me I thought about the definition of schizophrenia: a series of lucid thoughts that revolve around a delusional thought. Here is the debate on the referendum that is also enjoyed if you are a constitutionalist or political scientist; but this debate concerns a question so useless for the future of our country that it is offensive in itself to ask why to vote. As for the position of the Democratic Party, they could vote no, maybe, maybe … they don’t believe in anything. One thing is as good as another. “
The writer then announces that he will vote no in the referendum and explains why: ″ After the election of the leadership, I will vote with conviction No. And mine will be a vote against this ruling class ″.
Then the final lunge:
″ The Democratic Party is subject to a very serious lack of political identity. It does not have a clear position on the most relevant issues. It is water vapor ”.
[ad_2]
