[ad_1]
We live in an uncomfortable time, populated by these professional survivors whose only goal is to always be there, in any case and at any cost. What to say? “But fuck you, you and your lies” (cit.).
– Roberto Saviano (@robertosaviano) September 8, 2020
Among the tweets those in which the writer criticizes the secretary of the dem Nicola Zingaretti. And that’s why, in the confirmatory referendum on September 20, the Democratic Party will vote YES. Secretary Nicola Zingaretti has decided. A dry communication, to indicate the political line on an issue that does not seem important in itself, but that seems fundamental for the “Survival of the government.” What a secretary decision! What dry determination! Not like the ramblings in politics that she devoted to those who pointed out that her party did not flinch when it came to renewing the agreements with the Libyan torturers against the determinations of the national assembly of the Democratic Party. But it is understandable: political survival is worth much more than that of human beings that we do not even know, since the Libyan concentration camps hide them from our sight.
Playing now ….
And the writer concludes: “Before there was talk of cultural hegemony, today we are in the era of the hegemony of the superficial, that terrain on which semi-literacy and semi-culturalism are so disputed, raising dust. In all frankness, this referendum on which the fate of the government, the country, and perhaps the entire world would seem to depend, is nothing more than the definitive affirmation of a simple principle: politics deals with the inessential, since it needs to avoid the difficulty and complexity. We are living in an uncomfortable time, well symbolized by the mediocre emptiness of the head of this government, another subject attentive only to his own political survival and as insipid as Tuscan bread, which is nevertheless nutritious and enhances strong flavors ”.
rep
Referendum, what does the return of No mean?
And among the reactions that of the minister Dario Franceschini, which accuses the writer of having encountered a “fall in style full of inexplicable resentments.” Saviano responds clearly: “At this point I wonder what style is for Franceschini: it is to arm the hand of the Libyan assassins and renew agreements with them despite knowing, without possibility of denial, what happens with the Italian money and the patrol boats in Libya. The style is not to question the security decrees that Matteo Salvini wanted (we are seeing, we are doing, we are thinking, we are evaluating and in the meantime nothing changes). The style is to say that the political conditions never exist for a revision of prohibitionist laws in the field of drugs that bring with them the dominance of the mafias, the devastation of the South and the horror of the prisons. The style, in essence, is to be right wing pretending to be center left ”.
Among the reactions, that of the undersecretary of the Democratic Party, Andrea Orlando. “I am an admirer of Saviano, I have always defended him when he was attacked for his civil commitment. I admire him for his courage, for what he wrote and for how he wrote it, without stereotypes and clichés. I cannot say as well as the style of his considerations policies. ”Andrea Orlando writes this on Facebook, responding to a post by the writer about Dario Franceschini.
I am an admirer of Saviano, I always defended him when they attacked him for his civil commitment. I admire him for …
Posted by Andrea Orlando on Wednesday September 9, 2020
“Yesterday he sent” to hell “a political party and its secretary because they don’t like him. Today he insults a minister of the same party because he allows himself to defend a political community from his insults. Insults are, however, unique – explains the Deputy Secretary of the Democratic Party – I do not know, in fact, if at the time of disintermediation and post-democracy to say that one is “the most credited guarantor of the potentates of DC” still has any connection with some existing phenomenology.
[ad_2]
