[ad_1]
Place the Honorable Matteo renzi In tragedy or farce, it is an honestly difficult operation. “About him Recovery we want a real debate – said the former prime minister in the media – we will not make any pretext or ideological polemic, but there is no escape from a worthwhile discussion ”. Obviously, it would be nice if words were followed by deeds. Because the show that is staged these days seems to be the final coda of a gigantic one mockery of which the Florentine politician was not the only one, but one of the main protagonists.
That we want to discuss today where to allocate Europe’s billions of rain is naturally a good thing. Even if it is only to give public opinion an issue on which to reflect other than the pandemic that has suffocating information in the last ten months. But when Renzi later adds that “we will nail the prime minister to content,” he forgets what, in the three years he was in office, a credible politician should have learned.
First of all, the lesson a man who led the Italian government itself should have learned is that in order to spend EU money well it is necessary to monitor its correct use. Whenever a European partner has whispered something about the honesty of Italians in the use of public resources, they have stood up. horrified voices in defense of the immaculate national spirit. Almost as if the beautiful country is not the land of the mafia, bribery and widespread corruption, which has now become a widespread cancer that has established itself in all levels of public life.
The last months of the Covid emergency have only given a sample of the insatiable hungry for money that the various corporations, cliques and mediators of all orders and degrees manifest themselves even in the face of the worst national tragedies. The scandals involved, as usual, politicians and former politicians, officials and members of the State, businessmen and criminals. How many emergency resources have illegally ended up in the pockets of scammers and corrupters will probably never be known, and ongoing investigations only point to the tip of the iceberg of the mistreatment.
With the arrival of 209 billion Europe, the outlook ahead should, however, make us shudder. Anyone who is dedicated to debating the fate of multimillion-dollar spending before speaking should ask themselves if Italy is a state capable of managing honestly such a large part of resources and the response that must be given is net of the legislation and culture in force, unfortunately negative.
A radical should be on the agenda to run for cover justice reform that no party, however, wants today, much less the former prime minister, rightly committed to shouting at justicialism to defend himself and his family from the ongoing investigations.
Second, any serious politician should ask himself how a nation hit by crisis and twenty years of economic stagnation can be rebooted in the presence of legislation and bureaucracy suffocating as those that generations of irresponsible politicians have raised to acquire dimensions without equal in the western countries. Renzi on duty must know that it is not enough to put resources in a system for it to work, but that the internal gears of the machine must be oiled and movable. Today, anyone who honestly wants to start a business to generate income and employment within a week is forced to give up by the absurd overload of rules that must be respected.
Because Italy has the record of the number of laws, articles of law and circulars in Europe and, consequently, the administrative structure more deadly of the continent? The golden rule of law is that the more you legislate, the more you are obliged to legislate: clarify contradictions, heal doubts, regulate exceptions. The substantial reason for the current situation is that parliament has over time become the mediator of infinite particularist pressure groups, providing Benefits to the honorable proponents and creating the conditions for consent then difficult to modify. In more than 150 years since the country’s unification, the number of standards developed has continued to exceed those repealed, leading to the paralysis entire economic sectors and discouraging the start of any productive investment.
Are measures being taken to reduce barriers to investment and access to public resources? Or with the votes of the different ruling parties, Italy Long Live Are you even still working to make everything even more complicated than it already is? And how will it be possible in this context to access and use the resources of the Recovery Fund for those who still have the will and the courage to undertake an entrepreneurial project?
Finally, before talking about the so-called content of spending decisions, it is convenient to make a consideration about the public debate that we hope will accompany future discussion. Renzi rightly calls for citizens to be informed and able to understand the options that will have repercussions. huge in the country for at least the next decade. But the impression is that the Tuscan politician does not really know what “public debate” means.
Italy is the country where there is one of the worst for thirty years conflicts of interest from western countries. Very few families control information abnormally and build public debates to protect their interests. A public opinion so weak, so confused, so supportive does not exist in any other country in old Europe. The result is much, too much like George Orwell He prophesied that it had become modern life, characterized not only by its cruelty, nor by the general sense of insecurity that one felt, but by “that emptiness, that colorless apathy.”
The Renzis are right to call public debates, but their appeals would be less sad if, when given the opportunity, they had worked to lay the groundwork for a real argument-based discussion. transparent and democratic.
[ad_2]
