[ad_1]
The letter with which Sergio Mattarella attracted the government and parliament in DL simplifications because it contained “heterogeneous” rules that had nothing to do with the original intention of the decree (above all, the modification of the highway code), according to Cesare Maffi de Italy today more than a hairstyle Giuseppe Conte runs the risk of becoming a dangerous “weakness test” of the Quirinal. Yes, because after all, the President of the Republic has reluctantly signed that decree, so as not to block some of the norms it contains and those so fundamental for Italians who are struggling with the aftermath of the emergency shutdown.
But the Head of State had two other options, suggests the economic daily, “to avoid the chaos committed“. First way:” intervene in the placing of confidence in the mega amendment to the Senate. In the name of the loyal collaboration between the powers of the State, his intervention announcing the risk of non-enactment would have alerted the executive and the legislature. “There was a very strong precedent to attest to its legality: that of Carlo Azeglio Ciampi, which challenged the bill of electoral reform at the suggestion of some of his advisers, forcing Roberto Calderoli to review it and give birth to the infamous Porcellum. Second way: “It could have promulgated, but asked the government to simultaneously issue a decree-law to cancel those articles (in particular the renewed highway code) from the legal system. smell of unconstitutionality“Having instead promulgated the decree en bloc, Italia Oggi concludes, confirms” that in similar cases the Quirinale tolerates the entry into force of provisions that would easily be declared unconstitutional by the Palazzo della Consulta “. And this is seen as a” a an indication of a weakness on which in the future a majority could rely on other rules that similarly violate the Charter. “
[ad_2]
