[ad_1]
Cairo has decided not to revolutionize the workforce and to keep a low profile in the shopping campaign. Is it Vagnati and Giampaolo’s fault? These are two of your options.
He chose the new technical director and then the coach. He chose to confirm almost entirely to the team, kept the disgruntled, did not deliver those who had shown they were not up to par. And of course, Cairo has also given its go-ahead to a shopping campaign that has made no difference to date.
It is a serious mistake to decide to entrust the management of a group built to a new technician with very specific ideas for another coach and for another system. If it were only a tactical problem, furthermore: we are talking about a group that in the solar year has shown that it has exhausted its path with Taurus. Not according to the president, who chose to detain Rincón, Meité, Zaza, to name just three names, and who did not resolve the much more thorny issues of Sirigu, Izzo, Nkoulou. The first convinced to stay, the second held back because the offers were not convincing, the third did not put itself in a position to renew and therefore now in the position of being able to leave in free transfer. Not forgetting that players like Edera and Millico ended up as spectators because they could not find accommodation within the market deadline.
This lack of revolution evidently affected the (non) market options. And this is how Rincón’s stay became a reason not to buy the expected director, the presence of Zaza avoided a heavier investment than that of Bonazzoli (zero euro). And so on, one could continue, paper after paper. Basically not even the most optimistic He could have expected Linetty to shake up midfield, Gojak and Vojvoda to settle in the blink of an eye, or Rodriguez and Murru to make a difference. The president had the last word, certainly listening to Vagnati and wanting to please Giampaolo. Two of your options.
[ad_2]
