[ad_1]
Riccardo mazzoni
It may seem paradoxical that on the day of the vote in Parliament on the Month, with the (for now) supposed crisis of government at the gates, dozens of agencies attended yesterday en masse to the treatment reserved for “Ottoemezzo” by the presenter Lilli Gruber to Maria Elena Boschi, whose participation was transformed at times into a real interrogation in which only the agent who verbalized was missing. Boschi complained about this with a very explicit tweet: “When I tried to talk about content they always interrupted me: for Lilli Gruber it is more important to talk about my photos than about the 200,000 million of the Recovery Fund. I feel sorry for the listeners.
Social networks were immediately unleashed on the question of the day, or if it was correct that Gruber pressed the interlocutor, more than political news, about the guilty circumstance of not having used the mask in the photo session that portrays her hugging her boyfriend. The overwhelming majority of the 15 thousand comments on Twitter were in favor of Renzian’s matrix: among these the evident battery of Italia Viva deployed in defense, several exponents of the center-right and independent commentators, but the voice of the others was not raised. parliamentarians – and especially parliamentarians – majority, who nevertheless do not miss the opportunity to defend the right of women in politics to speak of merits and not of private life.
Curious, given that in the same hours a statement from the Democratic Party, to emphasize the role of women in society, even coined a horrible neologism, thanking “the militants for helping the most fragile people”, as if “militants” were the feminine Plural of “militanta”, material to remove sleep in the Accademia della Crusca. But obviously there is a scale of rights that varies according to the moment and the political opportunity. Many, through the photos of Arcuri and Travaglio shopping without a mask, have invited Gruber to be equally implacable with them, remembering however that the extraordinary curator has always been treated with white gloves and that the director of the Journal. special guest of the broadcast.
But, beyond the daily guerrilla warfare on social networks, the most appropriate interpretation was probably provided by political scientist Sofía Ventura, who after having seen the episode of “Ottoemezzo” tweeted: “Now that Italia Viva is disturbing, or intending to disturb, What is always disturbing, to the Conte government, the mission seems to be to destroy them. Boschi has been invited to do so. ”And, if this is true, then the discussion becomes more serious, because it opens up a worrying scenario about the use of the television information, public and in some cases even private, at the time of Covid and the red-yellow government.
Information totally prone to power, which doubles its schedules to the direct Facebook of the prime minister at peak listening hours, which marginalizes the uncomfortable news, which since the fourth estate has become the fourth column of the government in cash permanent service. It is the antechamber of the authoritarian State, which is not incompatible with formal democracy, but which by means of a univocal reading of the facts tends to eliminate the differences with respect to the single thought. This drift has been going on for a long time, with Italians who, according to Censis, now resign themselves to not being citizens but subjects in the name of health, and with Conte’s attempt to build a parallel structure to the government to manage the funds of the Recovery Fund. Now that Renzi, after an endless series of penultimatums that ended in the air, seems to have really gotten in the way, retaliation and pre-emptive warnings are unleashed, with the threat that Quirinalists obsessively relaunch early voting. The Boschi case should not be emphasized, but the devil often hides in the details: woe to annoy the operator, and whoever does it must immediately line up.
[ad_2]
