Pope Francis censored by the Vatican on civil unions. And his revolutionary phrases cut ad hoc

There is a real mystery in the Vatican regarding the claims of French Pope on the law of civil unions also between people of the same sex. In an email from the editorial board of Dicastery for the communication, that ilfattoquotidiano.it is capable of publishing fully and exclusively, the order of censor all about the documentary in which Bergoglio he delivers his revolutionary opening. To sign is Massimiliano Menichetti, newspaper boss Vatican Radio – Vatican News and the Multimedia Publications Center, but it is evident that it informs indications of the heads of the dicastery of the Holy See dealing with the media: “Good morning everyone, in reference to the commotion the film has caused”Francesco‘by the Russian director Evgeny Afineevsky, for now we are not dating NONE News, neither radio, nor web. Not even about today’s movie or award ceremony in Vatican. A confrontation is active to face the crisis media instead. A communication from Room Print. Please let me know if you can, in the middle of the day and at the end, any reactions listeners and follower. No need to turn around comments, two lines of summary are sufficient. Thank you, Massimiliano Menichetti“However, the Pope, before the usual general audience On Wednesday, October 21, he received in an adjoining room thePaul VI Room the director and all his collaborators, thus giving their blessing to the work. But also considering that the documentary film, the day after the papal audience and the presentation at the Rome Film Festival, directed by Antonio World, brother of the director of The Roman Osservatore Andrea, received, in the Vatican Gardens, the “Kinéo Movie for Humanity Award”, Awarded to those who promote social and humanitarian issues.

But that is not all. In fact, to reveal the genesis of statements of the Pope on civil unions was the Jesuit father Antonio Spadaro, Director of Catholic civilization, in an attempt to avoid criticism from the conservative Catholic world. To the microphones of Tv2000, Spadaro explained that “the director of the film”Francesco‘brings together a series of interviews that have been conducted with Pope Francis over time giving an great synthesis from his pontificate and the value of your travels. Among other things, there are several excerpts from an interview with Valentina Alazraki, Mexican journalist, and within this Dad Francesco speaks of a right to legal protection of homosexual couples but without undermining the doctrine in any way ”. The Jesuit affirms that “there is also another testimony inside the movie where it explicitly says that French Pope he does not intend to change the doctrine but at the same time Pope Francis is very open to the real needs of the concrete life of people ”. And he adds: “Then there is nothing new. This is an interview already given long time ago and it already happened since the reception of the press. At the same time, however, we understand how within this film the importance that Pope Francis entrusts to the words of i hear and protection of people living in crisis situations or difficulty. What remains and draws attention is the ability to listen that Francisco shows ”.

But something objectively does not add up. In the interview to which you refer father Spadaro, published on May 28, 2019, there is no trace of the affirmations of Bergoglio about civil unions. The shots of the interview granted to Mexican television and documentary film made by the Russian director are the same and also many of the statements about homosexuals coincide, thus confirming Spadaro’s thesis, namely that it is asingle record which dates back to 2019. But obviously the gods were made cuts. In the Mexican television interview, responding to a question about people living in irregular situations, the Dad says: “If we convince ourselves that I am Children of God, that would change a lot. They asked me a question during the flight, after I got angry, I got angry because a newspaper reported it, about the family integration of people with orientation homosexual. I said: gay people have the right to stay in the family, people with a homosexual orientation have the right to stay in the family and parents have the right to recognize that son as homosexual, that daughter as homosexual, he cannot be expelled from family nobody or make life impossible. Another thing I said is: when you see some sign in children growing up you have to send it, I should have said from a professional, and instead I went out psychiatrist. Headline of that newspaper: ‘The Pope sends it homosexuals by the psychiatrist. ‘ Is not true! They asked me the same question again and I repeated: they are children of God, they have the right to a family, stop. And I explained: I was wrong to use that word, but I meant this. When you notice something strange, no, no strange, something that is out of the ordinary, don’t take that little word to cancel the context. What it says is: you have the right to one family. And that doesn’t mean approve homosexual acts, far from there “.

The journalist then asks a Bergoglio: “You made all one battle on same-sex marriages in Argentina. And then they say that he came here, he was elected Pope and now it seems much more liberal of what was in Argentina. It is recognized in this Description what some people who have known him before do, or was it the grace of Holy Spirit Who has given you more? ”. And the Dad he responds: “The grace of Holy Spirit it certainly exists. I have always defended the doctrine. And it is curious, in the law of marriage between persons of the same sex … it is an incongruity to speak of marriage homosexualHowever, there is no trace of the words that Francesco utters in the documentary about Union civilians: “Gay people have the right to be in a family. They are children of God and have the right to a family. No one should be expelled or made unhappy about it. What we need to create is a law about Union civilians. In this way they are legally covered. I have defeated for this. “A story, that of Dad censored on civil unions, which recalls the letter of Benedict XVI false by the then prefect of the Department of Communication of the Holy See, Monsignor Darius Edoardo Viganò. Incident for which the prelate had to resign, although later the text messages between him and the archbishop were published Georg Gänswein, prefect of the Papal House but above all private secretary of Dad emeritus, from which it follows that the operation of making public only part of the letter of Ratzinger it had been previously agreed between the two. And now who will explain to Francesco why his sentences have been censored?

Twitter: @FrancescoGrana