[ad_1]
The one between Rome me Juventus It is the most delicate challenge of the second Sunday of the championship. And not only because in the Olimpico Pirlo’s gang will have to answer for Inter’s victory over Fiorentina, but also because extra-soccer reasons press around the game, it would be better to say extrafield, which could influence him a lot.
Rome, in theory, cannot lose. In Verona he drew badly, that is, the victory was lost mainly due to the voluntary absence of Dzeko, destined for Juventus, but two days later he lost the match because of the Diawara mess. At the same time in Juventus, despite the success of the round against Sampdoria, they were not quiet days being The case of Suárez exploded, a Uruguayan footballer who never came to Turin, but clearly favored in the Italian language exam, useful for obtaining a community passport, by the eventual professors of the University of Perugia.
The problem is that in Rome, coach Fonseca was already under attack, after the arrival of the new property, while the chorus of culprits was unloaded on Juve that, even before a criminal and sports accusation, hypothesize a penalty in the current championship or, in a more serious case, another decline..
Writing that the two teams are not very happy is not a bet Although it is true that only on Friday the CEO of Giallorossi, Guido Fienga, literally said that Fonseca was never in discussion and on the same day, in the Perugia prosecutor’s office, Juve’s lawyer, Luigi Chiappero, at the end of a very long confrontation with the magistrates. , reiterated the total strangeness of Juve in the Suárez affair.
In the midst of all this is a game that should have been different. THEmeanwhile with Dzeko at Juve and against Roma and then, perhaps, also with Paratici, Juventus sports director, protagonist of the reverse path. Fienga also reiterated that Paratici is only a rival, but many know that it was also a goal for Roma, looking for a sports director for at least a month.
For all this, Roma-Juventus will be a particular confrontation full of consequences. Fonseca gets out of the jumble of rumors that Allegri or Sarri are ready to replace him, in case of defeat tonight and in Udine, if he wins or draws. Juve reaffirms their leadership only if they win a difficult match after their smooth debut with Sampdoria.
For a silent minority, to which I belong, Andrea Pirlo is not (yet) a coach. Less than ever would be leading a Juventus still wrapped in some tactical misunderstanding (the flexible game system is a theoretical contortion) and with too many players to manage. However, three points in the Olimpico, although emptied of the public that would have turned it into an incandescent arena, would give continuity to the results and make the atmosphere more serene.
Thinking of a Juve sanctioned when it is not yet investigated is not very serious. But winning is precisely so that Juve reiterates that on the field they are still the strongest and that their rivals can only defeat them by following the judicial route.
In the end, however, the technical confrontation remains. Juve should be the same as in debut, with Frabotta replacing Alex Sandro, while Roma revolves around Dzeko. Scoring the team that ultimately turned him down could bring sweet joy.
[ad_2]
