[ad_1]
The pension yard between the government and the unions has reopened a few weeks ago and the temptation to sterilize Quota 100 grows in 2021 with a wide-ranging social security intervention that will be included in next year’s maneuver. In the first place, the hypothesis of replacing the early exit mechanism for 62 years and 38 contributions, finding an even more flexible but less expensive solution for public funds, based on a 2-3% penalty for each year in advance. compared to the retirement age of 67. However, it is not said that …
The backyard pensions between the government and the unions has reopened a few weeks ago and the temptation to sterilize grows in the Ministry of Economy Quota 100 starting in 2021 with a wide-ranging social security intervention that will be included in next year’s maneuver.
First, the hypothesis of replacing the early exit mechanism with 62 years of age and 38 of contributions finding an even more solution flexible but less expensive for the public purse, based on a penalty of 2-3% for each year before the retirement age of 67 years.
It is not said, however, that the operation advocated by the Minister of Economy, Roberto Gualtieri, as well as a large part of the Democratic Party and all of Italia Viva, it will be successful from 2021. Nunzia catalfo, and the unions are against it and intend to do Installment maturity 100 at the end of the next year (when the natural expiration date of the trial is indicated).
The head of the Via XX Settembre department can confirm the limited number of those who have used early departure this year and is preparing a package of interventions in the field of social security. This is the extension of Woman option (for workers under 60 years of age who accept the fully contributory calculation of the pension), as well as that of theSocial ape (for 63-year-olds who are in difficulties or belong to categories of workers who perform heavy activities) and Odds 41 for the precocious (those who started working before the age of 19).
Is not sufficient. Gualtieri can play at least two other cards. The first is the definition this year of a flexible exit mechanism that avoids the so-called ladder (a jump of 5 years) that would occur between 2021 and 2022, in the absence of interventions. The second is the provision of a kind of minimum integration for the future pensions of young people who, with discontinuous careers and precarious jobs, will be able to put few contributions in the farmhouse. Under these conditions, the game for exceeding Quota 100 could be open from the next maneuver. Also to give a signal to Europe that it has always seen badly the solution desired by the yellow-green government.
In the foreground, to replace Quota 100, at that point there could be a mechanism that provides for the early departure of 62-63 years with at least 36-38 years of contributions, against a cut the amount of the pension of 2-3% for each year remaining to 67. In the group of hypotheses, however, there is also the plan Odds 102, understood as the sum of 64 years of age and 38 of contributions, without penalty. As well as the possibility of foreseeing the minimum age of 64 years (even without 38 years of contributions) with the calculation of the full contribution of the diet, with implicit penalties on the amounts. Nor, among other things, should the proposal presented by the economist Pd be neglected. Tommaso Nannicini, which provides flexibility from 63-64 years, with the stabilization of the social Ape.
© All rights reserved
