[ad_1]
By Matteo renzi research on Open foundation, the former Florentine safe who financed his rise to power, is “a legal absurdity“, Constituted by magistrates” to whom the media spotlight he likes it more than the merit trial. “The former prime minister thus welcomes the prosecutor’s decision to register him in the suspect register together with the former ministers. Maria Elena Boschi me Luca lotti under charges of illegal party financing. Speaking at the inauguration of the national assembly of Italy Long Live, Renzi accuses the prosecutors of having sent “300 financial“At the home of business friends to run searches that then the Cassation would have canceled. The reference is for appeal presented by Marco Carrai – one of the members of Open’s board of directors – against the seizure of PCs and documents, which was later accepted “with referral“By the Supreme Court. Actually, in the motivations of that sentence the stoats challenge the Review of having”taken for granted“Equating the Foundation a a match joint. Something that may need to be proven at the end of a “rigorous verification“From open operations. And this is precisely what the prosecutor could have done before registering Renzi and the rest of the magical Giglio in the suspect register.” Today one of those pm was waiting for me in Florence An apology letterThunders the former prime minister instead. “Instead of warranty notice which concerns the entire Open board, including the undersigned“.
More than a year after the Open investigation began, for Renzi it is like a wound that reopens. It is at that moment that, in his opinion, Italy Long Live began to lose support. “We got off to a great start a year ago after Leopolda, we were aiming for the 10 percent in polls and we had hundreds of thousands of euros in financing, what happened then? A scandal, or rather a supposed scandal“He says live on the web from a Roman terrace. “That matter caused us a crazy damage: the polls have stopped growing, the money has stopped arriving, a huge damage to ours too attractive: many people did not come with us because they had fear“All thanks to the magistrates who” follow the virality in social networks more than the judgments of the Court of Cassation. “After the ermines have accepted the appeal presented by Carrai against the seizure of documents and computers, indeed, many within the former secretary dem’s newborn party have rejoiced, claiming that the Supreme Court has demolished the accusatory implant on which the research is based. “We have so much respect in the judiciary that we have read the judgments of the Supreme Court ”, reiterates Renzi today. “I hope that the Florence prosecutor has read them or at least understood them. In case of doubt, it will be at the discretion of our lawyers ”. Then he concludes: “Unfortunately visibility anxiety someone is likely hurt also to the other magistrates “.
In fact, according to reasons of the judgment (in which most of the requests of the defending di Carrai), the stoats of the sixth criminal section have not denied the work of the Florentine prosecutors. Instead, they challenged the Florence Court of Review to have “taken for granted”The equation of the Open Foundation with the organization of a party. An equation that, they explain, can only be demonstrated in the light of a “rigorous check of the action of the foundation, the type of relationship with the party or with their representatives, of the relevance of their operation for the purposes of the performance of the party or its representatives, the substantial lack of a different and autonomous function, which has been constantly manifested over the years. “All the analyzes that, the Supreme Court clarifies, the Florentine court did not carry out, limiting itself to” taking note of the accusatory thesis “and listing” a series of evidence, referring to contributions from the Foundation in support of the initiatives of a party or its representatives, but having erroneously taken for granted a kind of self-evidence ”. Hence the decision to accept Carrai’s appeal, postpone but again the entire record to the court of review for a new verdict “In the light of established principles.” The case of the friend of the former prime minister is different Davide serra: finished on the list of wanted entrepreneurs, he also appealed to the Supreme Court. The judges ordered the cancellation without postponement.
So how do you explain the expansion of the investigation with the inclusion of Renzi, Boschi and Lotti in the suspect register? The assumption is that between October 22nd – date the Supreme Court deposited the reasons for its judgment on Carrai – and the November 2 (that is, when all three would receive the warranty notice), Florentine prosecutors have acquired new insights into the Open Foundation, a result of the analysis of the evidence collected so far. In order to speak of a true “party articulation”, the ermines have, in fact, specified that “a mere coincidence of political objectives is not enough, but a concrete operational symbiosis, such that the external structure It can be said that it is substantially included in the action of the party or its representatives, which is why the funds allocated to it have a unique destination. at the service of the party“. Therefore, it is not enough for a foundation to contribute to expenses of some parliamentarians consider it as an articulation of the party. In order to carry out this equation “it is necessary not only account for grants or contributions in favor of the party coming from the body formally external to the party, but also of the fact that the real function of the party, beyond what can apparently be inferred from legal frameworkIt can be said that it corresponds to that of an instrument held by the party or its representatives, in the absence of one of their own. actual different operation“It is precisely the thesis that the Florentine magistrates seek to demonstrate.
[ad_2]
