[ad_1]
The film, for those who have mentally projected it several times in recent days, seemed particularly horrible: the Democratic Party that arrives torn to the referendum and is present, on the day of the count, a victory of the Yes that, however, is not theirs because it is Of course, a part of its people, net of the nomenclature, will vote No. And, on the same day, it runs the risk of losing to the Regionals, with Tuscany that at this moment seems open to challenge and Puglia that runs the risk of being fatal.
And it was particularly horrible, in the eyes of the secretary of the Democratic Party, to imagine the moment when he would have to go in front of the cameras to explain the defeat, also the result of the lack of alliance with the Five Stars, as Di Maio, on another channel, you can do. To boast of a plebiscite on a fundamental issue, which in any case interprets a general sentiment in the country. In short, for the Democratic Party the monopoly of defeat, for the Five Stars a victory, albeit mutilated.
If the credits drop after this scene, it would be a bad time. The problem is that, instead, the trailer of a second part is already visible in the Nazareno. And it is that, at that point, perhaps the Government will continue, for lack of alternatives, of courage, by inertia, because it is autumn and in autumn there is no vote and governments do not fall, by instinct of self-preservation, for a whole series of reasons more or less noble. But the effect of the vote, with its tensions, is discharged not in Conte, who sank as if the dispute did not concern him, but in Pd, where someone, specifically a part of those who have positioned themselves in No, by Giorgio Gori. Matteo Orfini and Tommaso Nannicini will be asked to discuss, in the right place or at a party congress, an alliance that does not work and therefore a leadership that has interpreted this perspective in defense. And in Congress they could support the candidacy of Stefano Bonaccini, who in the referendum votes Yes as Zingaretti, but has already lived as a competitor in another political line.
The participation of the governor of Emilia in the political school of Matteo Renzi was interpreted as a signal, rather as “the” signal. Collecting the moods and arguments of people close to Zingaretti about the upcoming film, we obtain this synthesis: “Renzi’s work on the Pd has begun. He has realized that Italia Viva has gone bankrupt and wants to return with Bonaccini to an ultra-reformist line ”. Which, inevitably, would have repercussions on the Government, because if one leg of the table dances, it is clear that the entire table dances.
This is Nicola Zingaretti’s unspoken speech about Republic, in which the secretary of the Democratic Party declares himself “fed up with hypocrisy”, attacks those who vote for no in an “instrumental” way, weakening the “Government and the Democratic Party”, invites or challenges the enemies to come out internal. An intervention that, in terms of tones and arguments, to many, even close to him, seems particularly irrational and nervous. Almost an exit. The intervention of a leader who feels under siege and charges the internal discussion with pathos, to the point of tying the fate of the government to the result of the referendum. A tension as if a plot or a maneuver to unseat him was already underway. And, that is not a detail, as if defeat were inevitable. Fifteen days after the vote, and a few days after the party leadership in the referendum, it is difficult not to read the reasoning as a preparation for the post-vote, typical of those who fear prolonged attrition. Also in terms of line.
Basically, theirs is, more than a threat, an appeal – to the party, to its currents, to its various souls, to whom until now they have not spoken clearly and transparently – to indicate, if there is another. In a “clear and practicable” way, because “the Democratic Party is willing to face any scenario”, including early voting. These are the words of a secretary who does not announce a count in an indispensable line, but who continues to act as a guarantor of internal balance, just as a few months ago he placed himself as a guarantor of balance by agreeing to form a government of which he was not entirely convinced .
It is not known where the political imaginary of a party infected unanimously, in all its sensitivities, by the governance virus will lead, but the reporter cannot fail to note that there is already a change of line with respect to the secretary himself who, makes just a few weeks. He calls for a “tipping point” because he was unhappy with the government on immigration and security decrees, Mes and industrial crises from Ilva to Alitalia and, even before, prescription. And that is: a little in all the fields in which the Five Stars have managed to successfully defend their flags, even if they have lost half of the votes. The most mischievous might notice that, on the one hand, if the government had put its hand to Ilva, perhaps the elections in Puglia would not have lived with this palpitation, more than a referendum. You say what you want to do, so is today’s title. It seems that the only ones who know this at the moment are the government allies.
[ad_2]
