[ad_1]
The Provincial Command of the Guardia di Finanza of Naples, as part of the checks on the recipients of the “Covid-19 spending bonus”, found that more than 700 subjects improperly obtained the benefit declaring to be in conditions of economic hardship or poverty such as not allowing even the minimum supply of food and basic needs.
It was found, in fact, that one or more members of the monitored households, as the case may be, had received a salary or a pension, even for high amounts, received the Citizenship Income, unemployment benefit or other subsidized social benefits or altered their family situation indicating fictitious or non-resident subjects to increase the amount to be received.
There are really many important situations: from spouses who both requested the bonus but for the same family unit, to subjects who have already received alimony for separation, to holders of VAT numbers and even to relatives of members of the crime. organized.
In most cases, it turned out that the monitored households indicated an ISEE with a value lower than expected.
In this sense, the case of a Neapolitan lady discovered by the Yellow flames of the 1st Metropolitan Operating Unit that presented an ISEE certification of 4,895 euros, but which in reality, according to what was established, exceeded 67,000 euros.
The company also maintains savings in its checking accounts amounting to 325,000 euros and real estate assets worth approximately 36,000 euros.
Altogether, administrative sanctions were imposed, for improper reception of public funds, for more than 250,000 euros and the offenders were reported to the municipal bodies, in order to initiate the recovery of the sums unduly received.
READ ALSO Naples, 4 thousand illegal barrels seized 4 arrests by the Guardia di Finanza
The control activities attest to the commitment of the Guardia di Finanza in the fight against all forms of crime to the detriment of national public spending, in order to prevent and repress, especially in a period of economic and social crisis caused by the health emergency, cases of misperception of public resources allocated to families really in need and most affected by the economic effects of the ongoing emergency.
Last updated: 07:17 © REPRODUCTION RESERVED
[ad_2]
