Mezzolombardo, in the tunnel at 167 an hour: fined with a speed camera, appeals, but loses it



[ad_1]

Racing in a car can be expensive. And not just because you put your own safety and that of others at risk.
In this case, the driver who ran through the tunnel at almost 170 kilometers per hour was fined 848 euros. A penalty that the driver challenged before the Mezzolombardo justice of the peace, who nevertheless rejected the appeal.
The controversy concerns the report issued to the plaintiff on January 15 by the local police Rotaliana Königsberg: the driver was accused of having gone through a tunnel in Mezzolombardo shortly after 10 in the morning, at a speed of 167 kilometers per hour. . Well beyond the 90-kilometer-per-hour limit set on that stretch of road. A violation that had been found with the use of the Telelaser, which had also led to the withdrawal of the license.
In his appeal, reconstructed in the sentence, the motorist contested that the contested report lacked the legal requirements “since it does not contain any indication that the checkpoint was well marked by warning signs and visible to the road user. nor that the detection had been preceded by the verification of the correct functioning of the Telelaser. ”The verification mode also ended in the display: the driver stated that the speed detection had been carried out in the presence of a single station composed of two agents, that it was not visible. According to the plaintiff, moreover, the vehicle had been stopped “without taking into account compliance with safety regulations, since the officers to stop the plaintiff’s vehicle had followed a chase in traffic and to stop him first they accompanied him, then overtook him and finally had placed the service car in front of the offender’s.
However, findings that Judge Tiziana Toma did not accept: the report was made in compliance with the provisions of the law, also with regard to the correct notification of the presence of a speed detection station. For the judge, it was then verified that “the evidentiary effectiveness of the speed detector instrument has been achieved – he writes – full proof of the legitimacy of the finding of January 15, 2020, also supported by the photographic documentation that portrays the opponent’s vehicle in writing”. violating the speed limit ‘. For this reason the appeal was rejected: the driver, unless he decides to proceed with the dispute, will have to pay 848 euros.



[ad_2]