Maneuver, the Senate confirms the trust: the provision is law



[ad_1]





“We voted yes, but now the government decides what to do” – “We say yes to the maneuver but we give the government the responsibility of saying that it will grow. We are ready to work if there is a horizon.” Iv leader says so Matteo renzi in the explanation of vote on the maneuver in the Senate. And he adds: “If we affirm the principle that a political force cannot demand an account of how money is spent because otherwise the operator is disturbed, we transform Parliament into a place of crushing and we do not give stability.” “We ask for clarity on where the money that will never return will go,” he says of the Recovery Fund.

“To those who come to say ‘they are irresponsible because they question stability, I answer that I have worked to continue the experience of the legislature because we think that stability is a value but there is a time difference between stability and inaction.'” Like a bicycle, the balance is maintained if you move or if you are in a state of inaction, it ends the life of the legislature. That is why we ask for clarity ”.

Renzi: “We must respect institutional forms” – “They call us irresponsible and pierini, but respect for democratic forms derives a credibility of the institutions that now runs the risk of being put to the test. If the yellow-green government approves the electoral law in 48 hours, we go to the Constitutional Court , as did the Pd. If the Giallorossi government does it, will it shut up? “, adds the leader of IV. There must be” respect for democratic forms “,” a principle of practice “cannot pass, he points out in reference to examination of the budget law, and therefore “the overcoming of perfect bicameralism. If one practice is enough, it is being destroyed “. ‘Classroom”. Renzi calls for “compliance with institutional forms, from intelligence to budget law.”



[ad_2]