[ad_1]
In fact, the Azzurri were unable to depart for Turin after the competent ASL was stopped. Legitimate dialogue between clubs and health authorities
In fact, the Azzurri were unable to depart for Turin after the competent ASL was stopped. Legitimate dialogue between clubs and health authorities
3 ‘reading
Juventus-Napoli must be played again. And you have to remove the penalty point for the Neapolitans. The Coni College of Guarantee clarifies sports justice and brings it all back to that infamous October 4, when the Azzurri could not leave for the away game in Turin, valid for the second day of the championship, due to the positivity of some players. Napoli was unable to actually move from regional borders due to force majeure (ASL-ordered halt). Ergo, there is no penalty point and Juventus-Napoli will be decided on the field.
The dialogue between the club and the ASL is legitimate
There were warnings during the hearing at the Coni Guarantee College, especially when the General Prosecutor for Sports requested that the appeal be accepted and flatly rejected Piero Sandulli’s appeal ruling and defined the dialogue between Napoli as legitimate. and ASL. Sports justice of the first and second degree had condemned Napoli to a 3-0 defeat as well as a penalty point.
Loading…
Hypothesis retrieved on January 13
The final judgment comes, among other things, on the same day that six years ago Napoli beat the Bianconeri 6-5 (2-2 the result of extra time) in the final of the Super Cup in Doha. And with the Supercoppa, once again, the destiny of this Juventus-Napoli that should have been played in October will cross: the two teams, winners of the last editions of the Championship and the Italian Cup respectively, already plan a new challenge in Super Cup on January 20 at the Mapei Stadium in Reggio Emilia. For the recovery of the match for the championship, there was talk of January 13, advancing the round of the Italian Cup. But the solution would cause too many games to be postponed, triggering a rather complex joint problem. That is why the game was shipped “at a later date”.
The Attorney General: “The Court of Appeal took the longest step of the leg”
«It would be worthy of the best Neapolitan tragedy if everything had been set up ad hoc. Napoli wanted to make the trip and this is shown by the documentation. The trick is not there because it is blocked by administrative measures. Napoli didn’t have a reason in a million to miss that match. The team was ready to go. These are the outstanding passages of the speech of the lawyer of the Napoli Mattia Grassani in the hearing in the College of Guarantee on the Juventus-Naples case. To support the lawyer’s thesis and console the Neapolitan boss De Laurentiis about a positive result of the sentence, also the intervention of the General Prosecutor for Sports: “As attorney in a procedure of this type and as guardians of legality we say that it is a matter In our opinion, the Federal Court of Appeals has taken the longest step, we are talking about disciplinary justice and instead here justice is technical. The conduct of Napoli is not relevant in this process “. De Laurentiis said he felt confident, already on the eve of sentencing: “After a long time at home with Covid, I studied the disease. After the first two cases of Genoa, it was clear that my two infected players plus a member of staff could have contaminated others: for me it was a question of responsibility, both criminal and social: I couldn’t ignore two ASLs and be a Juve greaser. “
Juventus “indifferent” to the sentence
The decision of the Coni College of Guarantee to annul, without postponement, the sentences that inflicted 0-3 at the table and a penalty point to Napoli for not showing up in Turin, leaves Juventus “indifferent”. It is learned in environments close to the Juventus club where it is noted that history has always been “foreign” to the club that – can be seen in the same circles – appeared on the pitch at the time and date set by the calendar of Serie A.
