[ad_1]
TORINO – Today there is Juventus play again. Appointment to the federal court of appeals where, however, he will not appear. All planned from the beginning, when in the ancient history of the game, which should have been played in 4th of October, Juventus had immediately lined up on the side. “We are a guarantee”, explained the president Andrea Agnelli, stating that your club will comply with the decisions made in this regard. He welcomed the 3-0 at the table decided by sports judge Gerardo Mastrandrea, would also possibly accept reversal of sentence that could lead to play the game, probably January 13 in Turin. In short, the Juventus will not appeal and, therefore, if Napoli saw their team accepted today, the game would be played on the field. On the contrary, Napoli will continue in the legal battle to have their version of events recognized.
ASL AND PROTOCOL – Version of the events that today will be brought to court bylawyer Mattia Grassani, champion of sports law, who will try to show how it is not true that Napoli did not want to play the game and that he did everything in his power to succeed, as the judge wrote in his sentence. Because the heart of the story is just that. Because Asl 1 of Naples has banned the team from Gattuso leave for Turin, due to the two positives of Covid-19 (Zielinski and Elmas), but he did Sunday at 2.13pm when Napoli – again according to the reconstruction of Mastrandrea – had already dismantled the organization of the trip, after the first communications from the ASL. Communications that, however, did not explicitly prohibit travel and, in fact, referred to protocol Government-Figc Thanks to which games can be played although during the week there have been cases of positivity to Covid-19. Protocol which Napoli would have ignored, canceling the charter flight to Turin (and, apparently, also the hotel rooms) long before the communication on Sunday at 14.13. That said, with a flight quickly organized and ready to take off at 4pm, Napoli could have made it to Turin. But under what conditions? And would it really have been possible to organize the flight?
THE NAPLES LINES – Grassani therefore it has two streets: the first is to show that the first two communications of the Asl they should already be considered mandatory with regard to the travel ban; the second is to show that on Sunday at 2:13 p.m. the Naples He was still able to go to Turin and play the game scheduled for 8:45 p.m. and which you may have been able to delay until 9:15 p.m. Proving this, in fact, he could attack the reason why the sports judge condemned Napoli, that is, to have had a resignation attitude towards the match. And yesterday, Grassani himself explained to Radio Kiss Kiss: “Unfortunately, Napoli led the way in the pilot case. The only one treated differently, with a reading not adhered to the regulatory plan by the Sports Judge who decided that it was Napoli who chose not to leave, something that contrasts with the facts because Napoli was ready to leave until the communication of the region “.
He will also speak at the hearing Aurelio From Laurentiis in video conference. The president of Napoli wants to contribute his testimony about the party, probably pointing out how Napoli has adhered to what continues to be an institution of the territory, in addition to the only one that can decide on public health matters.
THE START AT 15.30 Everything will start in 15.30 and, since it is the only hearing of the day, the sentence is expected at night, although it cannot be ruled out that the court reserves more time, given the sensitivity of the matter. In fact, not only the legal case itself is at stake, but the political-sports question linked to protocol: the world of football lives on the brink of this difficult season and the conclusion of the championship is a fatal factor for the health of the movement. . the protocol It is the only way to complete the tournament: its violations, therefore, are experienced by the other clubs and by the same institutions (Lega and Figc in primis) with undisguised annoyance and deep concern. Considering that, so far, all teams have played their matches despite many infected (and also despite comparisons with ASL, as happened in Parma), not all would welcome the 3-0 turnaround on the table (with a penalty point) as an action of justice.
[ad_2]
