[ad_1]
NAPLES – Angelo Maietta, a member of Section I of the Sports Guarantee Committee, spoke with Radio Punto Nuovo about the decision on Juve-Naples “The college has identified some violations of the law in the review chain, the fact is that whatever the decision of the united sections, apart from the partisanship of football, would have been correct. President Frattini He is a person to whom I would entrust any type of decision, everything that is done within the guarantor college is done with impartiality, transparency and an analysis that is independent of any type of conditioning and help that may intervene. I want to reiterate this because yesterday I heard things that I did not like, the Attorney General is only part of the trial, we have them in front of us, not by our side. They protect the public law of sports, so many times it has happened that the streets of the prosecution and the university were separated: I mean this for the truth, we are a separate organization, not paper pins of the prosecution. From what I have read and heard, it was not the boarding school that surpassed it, but the Federal Prosecutor’s Office ruled that the Court of Appeals went further and got out of the way. They can say, insult, but we do not care. In my opinion, the Court of Appeals has made statements that technically leave me excited. We must refrain from certain semantic colorations. I add that the code tends to exclude colored phrases, so if they have been reported, the necessary measures will be taken and everyone responds for the way they act ”.
Analyze case by case
“Force majeure entity? I would like to make a clarification. Nothing is ever evident in trials, there are always cases that need to be evaluated from time to time. I myself have decided a sentence of the Trapani, where force majeure was invoked and in that case it was not recognized. Everything that seems obvious is not: we must always analyze and understand each case. There are three degrees of judgment specifically, for ordinary and sports justice. The unpredictable, uncertain, extraordinary events that constitute force majeure, could also say that it is not recognized, that is, it is also the historical moments that tilt things. Each type of condition and decision has its own why, it is welcome that there are very high profile judges who have been able to understand the correct reasons and arguments.
The continuation of the championships is not undermined
“To undermine the continuation of the championships? Absolutely not. Each sentence sets a precedent, but we must not go to see that we are talking about COVID-19, we could also talk about something else. However, we must not assume that all future cases are the same, each time we must see specifically. With yesterday we developed one thing, very clear: the Italian sports system is autonomous “
[ad_2]