[ad_1]
The condemnation of the law presented this week to Parliament in Westminster by Boris johnson, to circumvent the Brexit agreement signed last year with the European Union, it does not come only from the two old conservative premieres. Several deputies from her party criticize her, threatening to vote against her. Confindustria, the Financial times and the Labor opposition. Not to mention the EU, which immediately defined it as the gravestone for negotiations on future trade deals, of which a possibly decisive round is underway this week in London.
rep
Brexit, London ultimatum: “The EU accepts our conditions, if not, for negotiations.” Here because
Everyone sees the initiative as a recipe for a “no deal”, an exit from Europe without agreements of any kind, with catastrophic consequences from an economic point of view for the United Kingdom and the risk of no less serious consequences from the point of view political and constitutional vision, offering a perfect excuse to Scotland for an independence referendum.
Legal experts and state officials, such as the chief government attorney who resigned in protest, warn that it is rare for a democratic state to renounce an international treaty. And that in doing so Britain risks losing the moral authority to condemn similar violations: for example, how to criticize China for the crackdown in Hong Kong, in violation of the 1997 treaty that returned the British colony to Beijing if London Are you doing the same with Brexit now? This is what Theresa May and John Major mean when they talk about irreparable damage to the UK’s reputation. If the nation in which the “rule of law” was born, the rule of law, renounces its signature at the foot of an international agreement, who can trust it?
rep
Brexit, London ultimatum: “The EU accepts our conditions, if not, for negotiations.” Here because
But Downing Street is being downplayed for the moment. “The Protocol on Northern Ireland”, which would be circumvented by the new British law, “is not a normal international treaty”, comments a spokesman for Johnson, “but a document that was quickly approved by both parties, assuming that they would have needed clarifications and interpretations “. So much ado about nothing, then, according to the prime minister’s office.
About whose movement two hypotheses circulate in London. One is that it is just a hoax, to scare the EU and get concessions in the final part of the negotiation. The other is that it is the result of pressure from Dominic Cummings, Johnson’s top adviser, known as the Downing Street “Rasputin”, with the specific aim of leaving the EU with the “no deal” and allowing Britain to do so. make. what it wants in the field of state aid to companies, particularly in the high-tech sector and in general to maintain the consensus achieved in last December’s elections among the working class in the “red zones” of Labor.
Rather than a Singapore on the Thames, as some feared, the post-Brexit UK would in this case be a kind of state capitalism trampling on the liberal privatizations of Margaret Thatcher. And then there is a third hypothesis: that Boris Johnson, as often happens to him, still does not know how to proceed, playing everything on the edge of the precipice without having the slightest idea of how the game will end. In any case, the truth will soon be discovered: perhaps on October 15, if we must pay attention to the new deadline set by the leader of the Conservatives, in any case December 31, when the transition phase and Brexit will end, one way or another. another will become reality.
