[ad_1]
Vincenzo De Luca has rejected the new executive dpcm. “The government will assume the health and social responsibility derived from its elections, always postponed and always fragmented,” the Campanian president wrote in a statement. The governor is especially opposed to the curfew from 22 to 5, so much so that on Facebook he expressed himself like this: one more measure than against Covid, against stray dogs, since it does not affect 99 percent of citizens. “Therefore, a useless intervention according to De Luca, who instead would have wanted stricter measures for the” tens of thousands of people who, on weekends, Sundays, go to mass to walks and historical centers, without business or health reasons, and in the absence of any control “.
Campania’s president also accused the executive of not listening to the regions. “We ask the government for three specific things, immediate measures of renewal or tax relief; parental leave for dependent working mothers, with full pay and a nanny bonus for self-employed workers; Homogeneous and simple measures throughout the national territory, given that the infection is now widespread throughout the country. These requests were not accepted. “ The governor admitted that in the dpcm there are also useful measures, but his judgment on the handling of the Covid epidemic remains negative: “The general line that the government has taken is clear: instead of clearly choosing the line of infection prevention , choose to intervene after the infection has broken out. It is not a responsible line and, above all, it is not very effective from the point of view of results, “Vincenzo De Luca continued on Facebook. And, according to him, it is precisely these intermittent measures that generate confusion and social tension.
Finally a few words about the school. “One wonders what has changed compared to the last two months, during which the Minister of Education repeated to us that activity within schools would never, ever, be closed.” De Luca explained that precious weeks have been lost, which would have helped curb infections in the 0-18 age range. “Also, elementary school children have to wear a mask in class. It’s frankly disconcerting. “ He concluded.
[ad_2]
