“I’m targeting the populists.” But Fazio scores his own goal



[ad_1]

Punctual as every year returns “Che tempo che fa” di Fabio Fazio, this time on Tai3 after last season’s transition from Tai1 to Tai2. And the driver never misses the opportunity to argue with those who in recent years have criticized him for the millionaire salary, from Matteo salvini.

“He was not the only politician who attacked me, let’s say he is in good company. The reasons? Attributable to a generalized, prevailing populism, it is much easier to attack when one is known, perhaps popular.”says Fazio interviewed by The impression speaking of the leader of the League. And add: “I did what many of my colleagues do in the world and in Italy. Gerry Scotti, Maria De Filippi, Giovanni Floris. It is a way of having total control of the product, the guarantee that you will invest everything you can in the program “. Fazio is convinced that the Rai should favor “The birth of many small companies scattered throughout the territory” and “helping talents to grow”. Regarding costs, however, the tenant explains: “In a ruling, the Court of Auditors said that Che tempo che fa costs half that of any other variety. We have saved the company millions of euros, the program is paid for with advertising. This was also a smear campaign, the fruit of populism ”.

Among the parliamentarians most critical of the mega gold contract for Fazio and his company “Officina” has always been the deputy from Italia Viva Michele Anzaldi, secretary of the Rai Oversight Commission, certainly not a dangerous populist or center-right sovereignist. The parliamentarian Renziano, contacted by telephone from IlGiornale.it, responds rhyming to director Rai: “Fazio’s words in his mega contract are a real own goal. To defend the contract with his company and the role of producer of his broadcast, the presenter compares himself with Gerry Scotti, Maria De Filippi, Giovanni Floris: all faces of commercial television, not of public service paid with the license fee. Is there really no difference between public and private television? And then he misquotes the phrase from the Court of accounts, which never said that the cost of its broadcast is half that of any other variety, but half of the first evenings of Rai1 series, such as Montalbano or other fiction. But what comparison is this? “So, what does the judgment of the accounting judiciary say? On this Anzaldi prefers to quote the text of the magistrates:” The sentence speaks of a cost per episode of 409,700 and an estimated collection of 615,000 with a participation of 18-20% Actually, the share in Rai1 was 15% and in Rai2 it was even halved to 9%, but the costs remained the same. If the Court of Auditors ruled today, how could you argue that the program is not Besides, that sentence acquitted Rai simply because he had anticipated that charge: what happened next. “

Renziano Anzaldi goes on to point out: “Fazio attacks Salvini but the Salvini Rai, chaired by Marcello Foa, has left him in place without even touching the tender by the Officina, which has been renewed every year by the yellowish Rai in the Fazio conditions “. In this regard, an indiscretion by Adnkronos reveals that Rai’s Board of Directors could be extended by one year compared to the 2021 natural term. A hypothesis that Anzaldi flatly rejects: “It would be not only illegitimate but also the triumph of tafazzism. It would be really inexplicable to expand the Board of Directors decided by Salvini, chaired by a non-guarantor president like Foa ”. The reaction to the proposal of the president of the Chamber is different Roberto Fico proceed with a new reform that will finally free Rai from the parties. Anzaldi opens with this: “Fico’s appeal cannot be withdrawn, we have a historic opportunity to really reform the public service, also because cases like Fazio’s are not isolated. The self-regulation code against conflicts of interest of tenants and agents has been in force since September 17: how have conflicts of interest been eliminated? What good is this code if Fazio’s broadcast, for example, is still populated with faces that almost all are attributable to a single agent, that is, to Caschetto? The Rai M5 seen in these two years has failed in all fields, from the fight against waste to the protection of pluralism, so Fico’s call must be heard ”.

[ad_2]