[ad_1]
Dear aldo,
My skin wrinkles at the very idea that Professor Mario Draghi should be submitted to the approval of those (politicians and politicians) who daily testify to their inability to stay where they are. But since it is not correct to make a bunch of all the grass (not excluding the position of the unnameable, the populists and the narcissistic and professional agitators) to the 5Stelle that my horrified thought goes. And I wonder: with what critical, political, deontological or reasoning instrument can these poor children decide? They are in the Palace, they face a tall person (Mario Draghi), a king, whose mere name makes them more naked than they are.
Giusi Furnari
Dear Giusi,
Taking it out on MPs is the easiest way to get applause, so it is best avoided. In addition, there are almost a thousand parliamentarians, and among them by statistical necessity there are also trained and competent people, as well as obviously many respectable people. There is some truth in what you write, kind Mrs. Furnari.
Striscia la Notizia issued an amusing montage of statements by prominent politicians that a Draghi government was absolutely impossible. Obviously they were wrong. I can assure you that, in the days of the vote of confidence in the Conte government, I did not find any senators at Palazzo Madama, except for a couple of more forward-thinking colleagues, willing to make or support Draghi’s name. And this despite the fact that it was already clear that it was the best solution.
The truth is that Draghi among the parliamentarians almost nobody wanted him, although in the end perhaps almost everyone will vote for him. The simple reason: the parties will not touch the ball, or in any case the current leaders will count less than before; just when there are 209 billion to spend. But the technicians come when the politicians fail. So it was for Ciampi, when in 1993 the system was crumbling under the blows of Mani Pulite; for Dini, when at the end of 1994 the alliance between Berlusconi and the Lega that had won the March elections was broken in advance; for Monti, after the fall of Berlusconi in autumn 2011. And so it will be now for Draghi.
TODAY’S OTHER LETTERS
The injustice
Unfair Award for School Staff in March 2020
I am the director of a comprehensive school in Genoa. On January 9, note 484 from the Ministry of Education arrives, with instructions for educational institutions about the award provided for in art. 63 of Legislative Decree March 18, 2020, in favor of school personnel who worked on site in March 2020. We thus discover that Legislative Decree 18/2020, signed a few days after the WHO pandemic declaration, provided for an award for the staff who worked in person in March (Ata staff, because the teachers were already in distance education). In practice, the school collaborators and the administrative assistants who worked in presence that month, with a workload and a risk of contagion of more than half, since neither students nor teachers were present at the school, have the right to an additional bonus, proportional to the days. actual presence, the calculation of which has been compromising school secretariats for days. At a time of economic crisis of enormous proportions, during which millions of people, especially women, have lost their jobs or seen their rotation contract or are still waiting for layoffs and in which schools are busy managing the pandemic (compliance with anti -Covid protocols, students and staff in quarantine, in addition to routine work), we must take care to reward those who, in that month, were lucky enough to continue doing their work or to receive a salary even without having worked at all, as happened in the following months, when many schools closed. Fair and equitable use of public resources?
M. Orestina Onofri
SEND US YOUR LETTERS
We propose you to share experiences and reflections. Share a space in which to discuss without having to raise your voice to be heard. Continue to deepen the great issues of our time and contaminate them with life. Tell how the story and the news affect our daily life. Tell the messenger.
TUESDAY – THE CURRICULUM
We publish the letter with which a young person or an already trained worker presents their skills: foreign languages, technological innovation, taste for a job well done, artistic professions; speak Chinese, invent an application, have a technique, play or fix the violin
Submit your CV
WEDNESDAY – THE JOB OFFER
We give space to a company, of any field, that struggles to find personnel: interpreters, start-uppers, welders, luthiers.
Send offer
THURSDAY – INJUSTICE
We ask to be told about an injustice suffered: a case of medical malpractice, a problem at the bank; but also a restaurant where they have eaten badly, or a public office where they have been treated worse. Obviously, the right of reply will be guaranteed.
Report the case
FRIDAY – LOVE
We ask you to tell us a love story or send a letter to the person you love through the Courier. Not the mail of the heart; a window open to life.
Tell the story
SATURDAY – GOODBYE
We propose to fix the memory of a person who has been fundamental to you. A daughter may tell a father, a husband his wife, a student the teacher. So every Saturday we choose the profile of an Italian who has left us. But we read them all, and they will all enrich us.
Send the letter
SUNDAY – THE STORY
We present the story of a reader. A real or fictional story.
Submit the story
THE READER’S PHOTO
Every day we choose an image that has made you angry or excited. The testimony of the deterioration of our cities, or of their beauty.
Send us your photos on Instagram to the account @corriere
[ad_2]