[ad_1]
Bergoglio, the Franciscan Pope, is as divisive as all those who practice active politics. Distracted, approximate if he speaks of doctrine, teaching, obsessive in the mundane and in particular Italian, without ever hiding, not even from a sometimes disturbing mimicry, his passions, favorable or ruthless. Among the things of the world, the homosexual unions, whose support Quick He immediately unleashed opposing factions by being this divisive Pope, either you love him with an ideological love and therefore fanatic or you hate him as the antichrist. What did Bergoglio say, filmed in the documentary by Evgeny Afineevsky? He said: “What we have to create is a law on civil unions. In this way, homosexuals would enjoy legal coverage. I have defended this ».
Reactions and interpretations
I have defended this: and immediately Capernaum leaves. Those who suspect this sometimes disconcerting Pope say: here, throw the hook left gender, who is abandoning him after the failures of his financial revolution in the Vatican; here, try to divert attention from recent scandals, the Becciu that he himself had hooked up with his mistress Marogna and all the stench of spies, thieves, more or less devious, more or less conceited services. Others go further, the departure of Francis would be one more blow to Catholic morality, under the authority of the Ecclesia, the Pope chosen by the imams after the expulsion or surrender of Ratzinger is here to deliver the West to Islam in arms, even if in Islam homosexuals do not enjoy legal cover but a grave.
They answer ultras of cattocommunism decrepit but never docile: but what do you say, it’s just a phrase, cut and sewn into a documentary. But what does he want the Church to remain bad and tetragonal to homosexuals? But, do you not understand that if this Church has lasted two millennia it is because it knows how to renew itself, it can understand the times? And then Bergoglio did not say that homosexual couples must have a family, but that they must be able to stay in a family; And this does not only concern Italy, it speaks in a general, global sense.
A bit sophisticated distinctions, if a Pope says that he has the right to a law, that he defends it, he really means a norm to protect the new nuclei, a norm that is not lacking in the Italian system; And if he then speaks in a global sense, how do we put it, precisely, in that vast part of the world in which homosexuals are exterminated and, by chance, in that world in which Bergoglio is so conscientious when not openly in solidarity?
Abrupt forms
With interpretations everything can be done, they are valid until proven otherwise and in the internal jurisdiction of a Pope there is no contrary evidence. Certainly, to stick to the words said, the Pope opens to the human understanding, Christian towards the discriminated, single or tied and that is beautiful, it is a noble gesture that can be shared. And it does not come out of nowhere, Francis had already explained, he had welcomed children born of non-canonical unions – in the documentary there is an express reference to the case of one who wanted to raise his three children, adopted with his partner, in Catholic morality and Pope. he had argued, he had personally removed the obstacles. There is coherence in this, there are evangelical scruples and also, if we want, holy malice divert the Church towards the times; what is striking and stunning are the tones, the paths: this pontiff does not seem to know soft diplomacy, he does not wait for long adaptation times, he speaks when he wants, especially aerial statements and his entourage is increasingly recommended to the saints . Many Catholics say: it’s okay to open up, to welcome, but is that so? It is one thing if I say so, any faithful, and another thing is if the Catholic Pope does.
Social dimension
But does this holy man think about the consequences? Bergoglio the divisor suffers the effect of Peter with the wolf: if he is concerned about welcoming everyone into the bosom of Mother Church, without distinction of race or sex, they do not believe him, doubt, fear him and not without reasons because this is a Pope what does not love the individual but the mass, distrust capitalism, privilege the social dimension and, let’s face it, socialist, hallucinates when it talks about inequalities; He supports almost provocatively the traffic NGOs, the social centers of the thugs, sends a cardinal electrician to cover the theft of electricity to the thieves who do not pay and celebrate, Casarini tells the city ruffian of land and sea ” brother I’m here ”, he fights to defend the Catholics massacred around the world on behalf of other religions to which he adheres. Those who do not love him object: wants to reduce the Church to a colossal NGOHe is not concerned with the original mission that is to announce the Gospel; and its possessed defenders: but more Gospel of love for the smallest and most discriminated against, what can there be?
[ad_2]
