[ad_1]
I know Massimo cacciari represents the best of national political thought, we are really badly taken. If, on the contrary, it is only the walking compendium of a category (intellectual workers by profession), then we can see why in Italy it is not possible to find someone who will accept the invitation to face the challenges of a plunged time in ignorance and in communicative redundancy, which transforms the public discussion in noise: “in the 20th century, philosophers tried to change the world. In the XXI it is time for them to interpret it differently ”.
Last night Andrea Scanzi and the virologist Massimo Galli they made a good attempt to return the wandering philosopher to the realm of concretion (from the operaistas to Romano Prodi, passing through Berlinguer’s PCI) in the midst of the excitement; interested only in “doing the phenomenon” by listing the critical issues unresolved by the current government. Giving the impression of having lived the last decades in Nepal, not as a Roman MP between 1976 and 1983, then as Venetian mayor from 1993 to 2000.
running for office institutional from which he should have learned that the loss of the driving force of the Italian business system does not go back to the appearance of the “Martian in Rome” Giuseppe Conte, but in the mid-seventies, when the investment hardening of the third generation of Italian private entrepreneurs began; a few years later, when theparticipatory industry by the State for endogenous reasons (the involution of the party potentates to ATMs) and exogenous (competition in the heavy steel and shipbuilding sectors of the newly industrialized countries; in addition to the contextual inability of an imbolsito administration to activate German counterattacks: qualitative repositioning of productions).
Hunt these things knows or still pursues the “northern question” of the canonical districts (the new development model della Terza Italia), made the impossibility of keeping up with their practices of incremental innovations the affirmation of the technoeconomic paradigm, based on the systemic integration in means, medium innovation like Silicon Valley?
After all, for decades the national collective intelligence has not produced an idea on how to get out of the exhausting calm of decline. He limits himself to denying it with the insipid rhetoric of the “excellencies of the country” (from poultry to Lombard health). And now we would expect a sizable neophyte to politics, Prime Minister Conte, to recover with a snap of the fingers. decades of delays intellectuals?
A controversy that is screwed to the overthrow of the majority of the current government, along with the other thesis, sinfully instrumental: the denunciation of the lack of exhaustive evidence in the medium term, when scientists clearly tell us that the pandemic it changes incessantly. That is, it imposes opportunistic adjustments as a necessity. While the Alessandro De Angelis would require the submission of a plan of at least ten years and relative set of actions detailed.
The fact is that the minimum request presented by the Cacciari, in their narcissistic enthusiasm for something else, is to have a group of clones of the John Maynard Keynes standard for Prime Minister Franklin Delano Roosevelt and for the technical committee. An irresponsible escape into the sublime, which will allow the good Manzonians (perhaps like the mischievous old boy Maurizio Molinari), at the service of the various John elkann and the like, to create a favorable climate for the new ides of March; that they will remove all obstacles to the plan to get hold of the euros coming from Brussels; they will sweep away any opposition to the Guzzini of Confindustria Macerata, according to which everything must be reopened. And if you die from Covid, it doesn’t matter.
The strong powers driven by the condescension of the pieces of government. While the assassins delegated in the play are already wandering: the killings of the right, the comedian Matteo renzi. Do you notice this in Lilli Gruber’s living room?
[ad_2]
