[ad_1]
“The name of Di Rubba was circulating as the one who had to settle the accounts of the League, and not only of the Film Commission. He was spoken of as a man of the turning point, for his competence and seriousness. He was a man of strict confidence in Salvini, he was part of his entourage and the positions that he later received within the party were a demonstration of these rumors ”. Former Lombard Culture Minister Cristina Cappellini brought it to the record before the Milan prosecutor’s office, speaking of Alberto Di Rubba, one of the three trusted accountants of the Carroccio arrested last Thursday.
“The indication of Di Rubba’s candidacy – he added – as the right person in the right place (for the presidency of the Lombardia Film Commission, ed) comes from Centemero”, treasurer and deputy of the League.
“Di Rubba came from the Salvini entourage,” added the former councilor who was heard at the end of last July by the deputy prosecutor Eugenio Fusco in the Milanese investigation that is also owned by prosecutor Stefano Civardi.
The minutes were filed together with thousands of documents that evidence, among other things, a series of suspicious movements in the company’s accounts attributable to Di Rubba, administrative director of the Lega in the Senate, and Andrea Manzoni, auditor of the Carroccio en Room . The two will be questioned tomorrow by the investigating judge Giulio Fanales, as well as the other two detainees, the accountant Michele Scillieri and his brother-in-law Fabio Barbarroja.
Meanwhile, there are a total of nine embezzlement suspects in the Lombardy Film Commission investigation of the case. In addition to the five to whom the precautionary measure was applied, including the three trusted accountants of the League and the figurehead Luca Sostegni, there are also Pierino Maffeis, Elio Foiadelli and Vanessa Servalli, directors of companies attributable to professionals who ended up under house arrest . And the businessman Francesco Barachetti is also being investigated, as it became known. It arises from the request for a rogatory in Switzerland presented in the investigation documents. In the letter rogatory of August 18, prosecutors also speak of the “Panamanian company that holds an account in Switzerland”, which also ended up at the center of the investigation.
[ad_2]
