[ad_1]
ROME – The distance between words and concrete acts, which sometimes seems sidereal, often becomes imperceptible in politics. And so we went from the reactions of outrage against the technical government to a slightly less raucous but still clear yes to Draghi. Even after Beppe Grillo’s visit to Rome, many senators remain undecided between the ethics of conviction, to quote Max Weber, and that of responsibility. There would be thirty undecided and a dozen willing to vote no. But Giuseppe Conte, now an integral part of the Movement, joins in to give a hand to the Draghi government, joins the assembly and clearly says that “turning your back on Draghi would mean turning your back on the country.” The former prime minister clarifies: “I fear the League, as Crimi also knows, but you have to stay at the table because you have to give the country a perspective. We must not isolate ourselves and injure ourselves. Conte assures that he has no intention of joining the government: “I will be there in the ways you consider correct, because you have given me so much.”
Hostility towards Berlusconi
An intervention welcomed with applause that puts Conte back at the center of the game, assigning him a decisive role. Necessary intervention, given the starting point explained by Vilma Moronese: “The mere possibility of supporting the Draghi government horrifies me.” There is not only the word “banks” to cause consternation, but also the presence of Forza Italia. The senator still keeps in her closet “the cork from the sparkling wine opened on November 27, 2013”, when Silvio Berlusconi was declined as senator. Matteo Mantero, often hostile to the League, is also tough. There is not only “the condemned Berlusconi”, but also the political profile of the government: “When I decided to lend myself to politics I did so because a movement had been born to defend ourselves from the same powers that Draghi embodied. And again: «We were born against liberalism. If we no longer stay to defend those positions, the frustration of so many people could take dangerous paths. For the Senator from Savona, it is better to take the ballot than to become “accomplices.”
The irreducible, or almost
Other senators such as Gianluca Ferrara, Alberto Airola and Matteo Crucioli are in similar positions. The entire ruling class is in favor of yes and the setbacks of Paola Taverna and Riccardo Fraccaro, initially very critical, have been noted. On the irreducible front is Alessandro Di Battista. Others slowly begin to change positions. Nicola Morra wants a vote on Rousseau. Barbara Lezzi says yes, but only to an electoral government until June. Danilo Toninelli first shoots and burns at Draghi and then, with the glee of a castaway, says “but that’s okay, I’m inside! Let’s see what Draghi offers us. With our suitcase full of proposals ».
Divisions and expulsions
A light travel case, already filled by Grillo, who has no intention of returning to the second round of consultations. Instead, you could launch a public message from your blog if you decided to vote for Rousseau. There is little desire to re-legitimize the Casaleggio platform, but a vote would be helpful in convincing the reticent. The “new governors” think most of it is done. If there were 5-10 votes against, they would probably be expelled. If there were more, a true division would be more likely. But with who? Go where?
The impression is that the consciousness of the irreducible has ended up in a dead end. A yes from the militants would put their backs against the wall. At that time, abstention could be a way of salvation. If the Orthodox prevailed, but it seems almost impossible, a split could occur in reverse. As is clear from the words of Giorgio Trizzino: «If you said no to Draghi, I would go. Probably to the Democratic Party, perhaps with a decadent step to the Mixed.
Feb 7, 2021 (change Feb 7, 2021 | 23:44)
© REPRODUCTION RESERVED
[ad_2]
