[ad_1]
SALVINI-ACCOUNTING, ROMAN DINNER (WITH TROYAN)
A dinner at the end of last May in Rome between Matteo Salvini, Senator Stefano Borghesi and Andrea Manzoni, auditor in the Chamber of the League and detained two days ago in the Milanese investigation of the Lombardy Film Commission case. The detail, as ‘la Repubblica’ and ‘il Fatto Quotidiano’ write today, arises from a report by the Gdf in the process of the investigations. At that time, Manzoni and Alberto Di Rubba, the administrative director of the Carroccio in the Senate and also arrested, were concerned about the dismissal of Marco Ghilardi, then director of the Seriate (Bergamo) branch of the Ubi bank, for some suspicious operations in accounts opened by the two accountants of the credit institution. According to what appears, among other things, according to a testimony from Ghilardi himself, the two had asked him to open “accounts” in the name of the “regional associations” of the Carroccio, that is, territorial branches of the party.
Lega Funds: Panamanian Trust in Switzerland
The transfer of part of the 800 thousand euros, collected by the inflated sale of the property for the Lombardy Film Commission, from Italy to Switzerland and, in particular, to a Panamanian trust company based in the Swiss country. It is one of the points that the investigations of the Public Ministry and the Milan Gdf, which two days ago brought the League to three accountants to the house, want to clarify in relation to the “final destination” of part of the provision (almost 300 thousand euros apparently) created. with the alleged illegal real estate transaction. The magistrates launched a letter rogatory for days in Switzerland to follow the flow of money.
Fondi Lega: Calderoli, never attended any dinner
“I have never attended any dinner with the diners to whom the press reports are attributed. Understanding that it is not illegal to go out to dinner, this has never happened: in the month of May I never went out to dinner with anyone.” This was stated by Roberto Calderoli, Senator of the League, in dialogue with the AGI.
THE QUESTIONERS
Operation that was not performed. In one of the interrogations carried out, as reported by the ‘Corriere della Sera’, Luca Sostegni, an alleged front man of the professionals and who is collaborating with the prosecutors after ending up in prison in July, said that Michele Scillieri, another trusted accountant of the Liga arrested, would have told him “smiling” that the money from the property deal for the LFC would have been used for the March 2018 elections. On this point, however, investigators have not found any confirmation in the investigations at the moment. which, however, have been following for some time. Also the track of the ‘black funds’ and intertwine with the Genoese on the recycling of the 49 million euros of the League of which traces have been lost.
Lombardia Film Commission: 4 arrests, 3 accountants near the Carroccio
House arrest for 4 people involved in the investigation of the funds at the Lombardia Film Commission, a company in the Region that deals with film promotion. The order of the Milan investigating judge based on an investigation by the prosecutor Stefano Civardi and the deputy Eugenio Fusco refers Michele Scillieri, Alberto Di Rubba, Andrea Manzoni, counters considered close to the League, and Fabio Barbarossa, under investigation for various reasons of embezzlement, alteration of the freedom of choice of the contractor and fraudulent deduction of the payment of taxes. Luca Sostegni, considered Scillieri’s right-hand man, was arrested for the same incident in July. The precautionary measure was carried out by personnel from the financial and economic police unit of the Milan Financial Police. More operations are taking place, reports a note from the Milan prosecutor’s office. The investigation focused on the purchase of a shed in Cormano (Interior of Milan) at a price inflated by the Lombardia Film Commission, with a surplus of 400 thousand euros compared to its initial value. The property was owned by a company in liquidation, Paloschi Srl, whose director was Barbarroja. It was Sostegni who acted as an intermediary in the operation, while accountants close to Carroccio ‘architected’ – according to the investigative hypotheses. Manzoni had been appointed chairman of the Lombardy Film Commission at the time.
Gip, from the Di Rubba appropriative operation
The examined elements analyzed induce the judge to attribute a substantially appropriative character to the real estate transaction, in fact holding, by the then president Di Rubba and his staff, the remaining capital in the foundation’s account, linked to the destination. and paid to the Andromeda real estate company. “This is what the investigating judge’s order says.
Domiciliary to avoid a repeat of the crime
Therefore, we reiterate the adequacy to the effective contrast of the danger of repetition of the crime of the only measure of house arrest accompanied by the prohibition of communicating with third parties. The form of precaution chosen is also considered proportionate to the specific gravity of the alleged facts and, consequently, the scope of the sanctions allegedly imposed. “We still read in the order of the investigating judge that ordered the arrest of three accountants close to the Law. Alberto Di Rubba, Andrea Manzoni and Michele Scillieri as part of the prosecution’s investigation into the case of the alleged sale at an inflated price of a warehouse in Cormano, in the Milan area, to the Lombardia Film Commission. “In conclusion – is underlined in the ordinance – there are all the conditions of the law, for the application against Scillieri, Di Rubba, Manzoni and Barbarroja, in relation to the crimes that respectively attribute to them, provisionally, the precautionary measure of home detention, accompanied by the prohibition to communicate with people other than those who live with the suspect or who assist him ”.
The counter: “We will do a thousand more …”
“We will do a thousand more … next time it will be fine, instead of 50 you will get 70 …”. Thus Michele Scillieri, an accountant close to the Lega who ended up under house arrest as part of the investigation of the Milan Prosecutor’s Office on the case of the alleged sale at an inflated price of a warehouse in Cormano, in the Milan area, to Lombardy Film Commission, spoke with Alberto Di Rubba: former president of the Lombardia Film Commission, also arrested yesterday. The interview of May 19, intercepted by the investigators, is contained in the order of the investigating judge, who ordered the house arrest of the two accountants and two other people. “Di Rubba and Scillieri on the unfortunate conclusion of the deal regarding the foundation and the land (that is, the real estate complex) agree on the need to overcome the discontent that creeps among the associates as a result of the profits that turned out to be less than the expected “, reads on the device.
Detained: “I found out about the deal at the Lega headquarters”
Andrea Manzoni, accountant and auditor of the Lega in the Chamber, “reported having learned from Di Rubba”, also an accountant and with the same role in the Senate, “on the occasion of some visits to the headquarters of the Lega in Milan via Bellerio del loan disbursed by the Region in favor of the Lombardia Film Commission, destined to the purchase of a property, where the headquarters of the foundation would be transferred. ”This is what we read in the order of the magistrate of Milan, Giulio Fanales, who ordered the arrest of Alberto Di Rubba, Andrea Manzoni and Michele Scillieri.
From the papers emerges a conversation, intercepted in June, between the accountant Michele Scillieri and his brother-in-law Fabio Barbarroja, who managed the real estate of Andromeda, speaking with Scillieri, de facto administrator of Andromeda and Paloschi srl, “about the lack of collection of checks issued “by Andromeda in favor of Paloschi” evaluated – summarizes the investigating judge – the opportunity to destroy the credit guarantees, which were left in his hands, to avoid their discovery by the investigating authorities “. Paloschi, in fact, never cashed the 400 thousand euros in checks paid by Andromeda for the shed and that money took other directions. Also according to the investigations, Andromeda then sold the shed to the Lombardia Film Commission for double, 800 thousand euros. An operation, writes the examining magistrate, in which the accountants have shown “rare skill.” In the business of the alleged inflated sale of a property in Cormano, the hypothesis of destroying the traces of checks that had not been cashed was also considered.
“Nobody lost us, then it went wrong …”
“When we did all the math at the beginning, no one lost us. Then the owner (knows how to understand Dubini Marianna) took her part; the one there (who understood Sostegni) took her part; I (who understood Scillieri, through Barbarossa)) I took my part and you (Di Rubba and Manzoni understand each other) took … At some point it went wrong. ”So expressed Michele Scillieri, under house arrest as part of the investigation by the Lombardia Film Commission, in an interception included in the order of the investigating judge, Giulio Fanales, which brought four people under house arrest: in addition to Scillieri, Alberto Di Rubba, Andrea Manzoni and Fabio Barbarroja, investigated for various reasons for embezzlement, alteration of liberty in the choice of the contractor and fraudulent theft of the payment of taxes. Di Rubba and Scillieri, according to the law in a passage of the ordinance, “after having recognized the conclusion dissatisfied with the deal related With the foundation and the land (to understand the real estate complex), they agreed on the uselessness of the resentment and nervousness that Manzoni still showed, both with the intention of meeting with him to overcome the difficulties of the moment in their interpersonal relationships; In addition, regarding the lack of foundation and claim of the economic claims that Sostegni is currently making, unable to assume, due to his limitations of character, as a partial sacrifice referred to the matter in question, he would have been more than rewarded with the profits that would later come. from other similar businesses ”.
[ad_2]
