[ad_1]
Fiorentina lost in the final to Roma, also determining the changes in Prandelli that made the team regress
Dragowski: 5.5. He alternates good things with some indecision, especially Spinazzola’s goal at the near post. On the other hand, he is good with Pellegrini on two occasions, as well as very lucid with Mayoral who approaches him in the second half: with his intervention he keeps Fiorentina alive.
Milenkovic: 5. Good for keeping Roma’s quick forwards at bay, he’s ready to ward off a sure shot from his opponents in the second half. But he’s the one who keeps Karsdorp in play by totally confusing the offside line. Decisive mistake (the second in a row), a shame because he had a good race until 90 ‘.
Pezzella: 5.5. Coordinate the department well, and the defense in general holds. An excellent closure even at a single level. But then he loses the Diawara cut.
Martinez Fourth: 6.5. Behind it is the one that stands out the most, also because its quality of progress is usually decisive. It can be seen across the board, it’s a great test. But he fails to close Spinazzola’s cut on Roma’s goal, and in the final he loses a ball that could have been bloody.
Come: 5.5. You have Spinazzola on your side, bad client. Lose a heavy ball at the end of the first half, even if you fight to the end. But he is a co-star in the episode of Diawara’s goal match.
Amrabat: 5.5. Fight in the middle of the field, somehow limits Veretout but the distance Roma midfield takes over.
Thumb: 5.5. Discreet exit, even if you lose too many balls. But above all the work of not having to help your colleagues is good.
(from 78 ′ Borja Valero: sv)
Castrovilli: 5.5. He starts to lose a lot of balls, then he grows up, but it still doesn’t affect him that much. He fails to reach Ribery’s panoramic opening at 35 ‘. Then he comes out with an injury early in the second half.
(dal 52 ′ Kokorin: 5.5. Longer playing time this time, his entry allows Ribery and Vlahovic to have more spaces, although the Russian touches very few balls).
Igor: 6.5. He controls Bruno Peres and makes good plays even in the offensive phase: he starts the action that leads to Vlahovic’s shot. He leaves due to injury, too bad
(from 42 ‘Biraghi: 5.5. Some offensive outing and good run, but he’s a long way from Karsdorp in the action that costs him the game)
Ribéry: 6.5. The soul of Fiorentina returns. So much so that the violets then fade when he leaves the field. It is he who serves Vlahovic on the shot in the first half, then tries to catch Castrovilli with a brilliant ball even if it is a little long. At the beginning of the second half he could have done better in that shot, after two feints, bounced by the defender, while it is he who starts the restart for the momentary equal lily. In his career he also took a shot from little. Then he comes out and he doesn’t take it very well. Correctly.
(dal 78 ′ Cáceres: sv)
Vlahovic: 6.5. He doesn’t score, but Spinazzola’s own goal is favorable, bringing Fiorentina back into the game. But beyond the episode, a generous competition to make ‘war’ with everyone, many times winning. A sacrificial race and many aerial duels won. In the first half he could have done better in the shot rejected by the goalkeeper, but in the second half he becomes the protagonist, exchanging many times with Ribéry. The southpaw on the move in the final was also good, rejected by Pau López.
Prandelli herds: 5.5. His Fiorentina deserves a more than positive vote until 90 ‘, but the final changes cut the legs of the team. And the episode of the goal of the match is only a consequence of a Fiorentina that in the final was too overwhelming, unable to restart as it had done with the entry in place of Kokorin. Of course, continuing to play with the three forwards was risky and there was a fundamental point to take home for morale and not only that, but without Franck, and with 6 defenders on the field, Fiorentina could no longer keep the ball in high or tall. . Sin. Cesare’s face at the end of the match is a whole program for another point (which would have been deserved) vanished in extremis.
