[ad_1]
Maria Laura Antonelli / AGF
“We are facing a situation that, if allowed to pass, will lead to the need for new closures. I think we need to consider tighter restrictions, particularly in Milan, Naples and Rome. Because the virus in this phase runs mainly in big cities ”. To say it is the virologist of the University of Milan Fabrizio Pregliasco. The virologist describes the new measures presented in the dpcm as “soft” and appeals to the common sense of the public. However, the risk is that if the situation worsens, we will see the strongest effects at Christmas. ” Winter period that is usually synonymous with ski season. But Pregliasco warns: “I remember at the end of last winter there was a bit of chaos. I would not like the white week to become a replica of the nightclubs that remained open in summer ”.
In addition to selective closures, the virologist sees in the added incentive of smart work and remote lessons (when possible) good measures to contain the virus, especially since the number of people in public transport would be reduced considerably. “I am convinced,” he maintains, “that the school must be preserved. To do this, it is convenient to ‘deflate’ transport a bit by promoting smartworking and adopting distance education for the elderly, I am thinking about the last years of high school and university, and keeping the little ones in class ”.
Next, a comment also on the world of restaurants, the one most threatened by possible restrictions on nightlife: “the supply chain of restaurants is at risk and the Government has the task of ensuring the provisioning of these workers. This is a crucial moment: if we fail to stop the race of the virus, the risk is that we will pay taxes on Christmas. It is true, the deaths are still few, but they are preventable deaths ”, adds the virologist. Finally, “measurement in gyms seems a bit skewed to me. I wonder who will stay a week if things are good. “
[ad_2]
