[ad_1]
Lawyer Luis Vizzino, an expert in sports law and a lecturer in the Sports Law department at the University of Salerno, expressed his opinion on the investigation of the Perugia prosecutor on Luis Suárez’s Italian exam.
What is your idea of the Suárez case?
“To date, we must not make the mistake of making hasty judgments. We must have confidence in the Ordinary and Sports Institution and the result of the investigations will certainly clarify the situation. I believe, however, that the election of the FIGC Federal Prosecutor is absolutely correct and necessary. ” Activate an internal procedure designed to verify the existence of any liability of the partners or subjects attributable to the company ”.
From what has come to light to date, how do you judge Juvent’s position with us on this matter?
“At present – I repeat – in my opinion it is impossible to make hasty and superficial judgments, and this also applies to the alleged involvement of Juventus.”
What are the risks for the club?
“In the case of a determination of liability by Juventus, the provisions of articles 4 and 32, paragraph 7, of the Code of Sports Justice, respectively, could be applied, alternatively or jointly. In the first case, The illicit conduct could be considered as harmful to the principles of loyalty, correction and prohibition, these pillars of the Sports Law. In the second, however, the violation of the federal rules of affiliation, carried out through the accreditation of false citizenship , would constitute a disciplinary offense ”.
There are those who have advanced, hypothesizing penalties for the Juventus club …
“They would certainly change, unlike the superior or non-superior role played in society by the parties involved and in consideration of the seriousness of the events.
Theoretically, a fine could be applied, as well as a sanction up to the most serious sanctions of demotion or exclusion ”.
[ad_2]
