[ad_1]
ANSA
The day after Di Matteo’s statements against Bonafede, at the Palazzo dei Marescialli, is made of expectations, silences and invitations to “caution in expressions”. The directors of the CSM are meeting in an extraordinary plenary session that deals with a completely different matter from that of these incandescent hours. In the silence of the togaed component, which awaits the institution as a whole, a note emerges from the three laymen at M5 altitude. “Those who have the honor of occupying an institutional position must know how to limit themselves,” write Alberto Maria Benedetti, Filippo Donati and Fulvio Gigliotti. They ask their colleagues, and therefore Di Matteo, a member of the CSM since autumn 2018, for “continence” and “caution” in expressions. Especially “when talking to the media.” And the reference to what happened on Sunday night, live, during the broadcast It’s not the sand by Massimo Giletti, it couldn’t have been clearer.
Nobody turns the cards over completely, but that phone call that shocked the institutions is on everyone’s lips. Di Matteo intervened Sunday night during the broadcast, accusing Alfonso Bonafede of essentially giving in to the bosses. How? Going back and unnamed, after initial contact, the well-known Dap PM anti-mafia summit. A “confidential” story (Di Matteo’s words) so far and released to the public square after two years.
The statements of the prosecutor of the negotiation between the State and the Mafia have been heavy, and the Guardasigilli will have to respond in some way. It has already done so, to a limited extent, responding in recent days. But weighing even more is the path of Di Matteo’s outsourcing. And it is precisely at this point that the three councilors elected at M5 altitude decide to expose themselves: “We want to strongly emphasize our conviction that the CSM councilors, forged and secular, should, more than anyone else, observe continence and caution and in the para express their opinions, especially to the media, precisely to avoid fueling speculation and political and media exploitation that are bad for Justice and undermine the authority of the Council, “the note read.
“We do not intend to enter the merits of history,” Alberto Maria Benedetti had anticipated at HuffPost. But the irritation at the scene that took place on live television is clear.
The three councilors say they are concerned “about the climate that has emerged, especially at a time when justice would require unity and collaboration between all operators, in the interest of the country and citizens.”
We do not ask for total silence, but for attention to the forms: “Those who have the honor of occupying a position of such constitutional importance must know how to limit themselves; This does not mean giving up expressing their opinions, but it means doing it in the correct forms and forms, they conclude, This is what we do, and we will continue persuasively, as in September 2018 Parliament called us to the role of CSM members. “
The toga wing of the autonomous judicial body, for the moment, is not speaking. “We are waiting for the institution to take a position,” Loredana Micciché, from the Independent Judiciary, explains to HuffPost. But no indication comes from the institution. On the front of the progressives sitting in the Palazzo dei Marescialli, everything is silent. Other voices are raised. Like the former chief prosecutor of Turin, Armando Spataro, who from the columns of La Stampa accuses Di Matteo of not paying “honor to the institutions.” Or that of criminal lawyers, with the leader Gian Domenico Caiazza who says: “Minister Bonafede is unjustly attacked, without charge and, in my opinion, illegitimately by an idol whose idolatry has led him to become a minister.”
[ad_2]
