Esperanza: “Juve-Napoli is not played, the priority must be people’s health.” But the Lega Calcio: “You can play” – La Stampa



[ad_1]

«It seems to me that it has already been decided: Juventus-Napoli will not be played, it is already consolidated news. But we talk too much about football, I also say it with respect to a part of the country’s economy: I know that there are interests around football and many people that must be respected. This was stated by the Minister of Health, Roberto Speranza, a Half an hour more, on the controversy surrounding the Serie A match. And he adds: «I know that around football there are interests and many people who have to be respected. What is important at this time, however, are others: it is the work of hospitals and health professionals and the care of our schools, which are a fundamental starting point for the country. A little less football and a little more school, if possible ».

The opinion of the League: let’s play
But the verdict of the Lega Serie A is contrary to the minister’s thinking: you have to play Juventus-Napoli. A few hours before kickoff, he reiterates with a note that we must go out onto the Allianz Stadium field: “In relation to the formal communication received from SS Napoli Calcio, the Lega Serie A clarifies that the current system of rules must guarantee maximum protection of the health.For the people involved, equal treatment between the different clubs, as well as respect for the principles of sports fidelity. On the bottom, it should be remembered that the Campania ASL note was limited to notifying the ordinary provision of isolation fiduciary in front of the close contacts of the player Zielinski. In the present case, however, the FIGC Protocol agreed with the CTS and integrated by the Circular of the Ministry of Health of June 18, which recognizes the opinion of the CTS n . 1220 of June 12, 2020, which was not taken into account even in the email of the deputy head of the office of the president of the Campania Region. ” With the Azzurri still in Campania, the result is a 3-0 win in favor of Juventus, which it is easy to imagine in Naples they will oppose challenging the provision even on the ordinary pitch.

The rule
The special state law applicable to the situation of Napoli that has two positive players in Covid-19, is the same one used several times during the season to allow, merely by way of example, Turin to face Atalanta. Milan to go to Crotone or Genoa to play in San Paolo, and today in Atalanta to take the field against Cagliari. The protocol provides for certain and non-derogable rules, which allow the dispute of league matches even in the event of a positive result, placing the players who tested negative in the tests carried out and reported within the time provided by the health authorities. The Council of the Lega -continues the note- has also approved a precise regulation that will be adopted in case of multiple positivity that can lead to the postponement of the matches only when certain conditions are met that, for now, do not apply to the case of Napoli , and there are no provisions of the State or local Authorities that prevent the regular development of the party. “The ‘rationale’ of the protocol therefore remains to allow all matches to be played and consequently the usual conclusion of Serie A Tim,” we read in conclusion.

The reopening of the stadiums

Beyond the Juventus-Napoli affair, Minister Speranza, on the possible reopening of the stadiums to the fans, is categorical: «I am against the proposals to open the stadiums to thousands of people, this would expose people to a risk real. If we have to take risks because schools reopen, I agree, but if we have to take risks to bring tens of thousands of people to the stadium, I am against it. It is a risk that we cannot face. I am on the line of prudence, which does not mean not doing things, but doing them step by step. The line of prudence has led us to a better situation than in other countries.

Championship suspension? The CTS has established rules that allow it to advance safely – he continued – another thing is public participation. I am against proposals to reopen stadiums to thousands of people, this would expose people to real risk.
“If we have to take risks because the schools reopen, I agree, but if we have to take risks to bring tens of thousands of people to the stadium, I am against it. It is a risk that we cannot face.
«I am on the line of prudence, which does not mean not doing things, but doing them step by step. The line of prudence has led us to a better situation than in other countries.

[ad_2]