[ad_1]
The first impression, let’s face it, was not exactly favorable. As a linguistic artifact of “ecological transition” it combines nine syllables, adds them in a fluid-gaseous state and ends up recalling bureau-Soviet abstractions or socio-something jargon between environmentalism and unionism. A “superministry” will then be dedicated to all this, an entity that uses the always lexical strengthening of turbopolitics and then it is difficult to remove the malicious suspicion that a grandiloquent pateracchio could arise. Hopefully we are wrong, of course: for the Planet, for Italy within the Planet and, within Italy, also (modestly) for ourselves.
Government, the hypothesis of merging Environment and Development to manage EU funds
by Emanuele Lauria
Unfortunately, the second impression is a bit like that too. What word is “transition”, in fact? It was in the title of a glorious political theory magazine from the Manifesto group. But it is also in the ritual formula of the “transition phase”, which plays for dynamic political physics the role that in static political physics is the “pause for reflection”: that is, substantially, the role of a box that from the void it has a function of myth or phantom. And who knows the Altan file, about the transition, how many cartoons!
Draghi sees the social partners. Wwf: “There will be a Ministry of Ecological Transition”. The support of the unions: “He asked for confirmation of dismissals”
But then you get past the superficial impressions, you work in depth, anagrams and you realize that the letters of “ecological transition” are the same of “exceptional dreamers”. How to oppose then? Everything will be fine.
The totogoverno
Totoministri, we move on to a short list. The new ecological transition. And Forza Italia asks for a place for Tajani
by Annalisa Cuzzocrea
