[ad_1]
He apologized but basically he hasn’t changed his mind. Antonio Cabrini said that his words about the relationship between Diego Armando Maradona and Napoles were misrepresented. That is to say, he expressed himself a little badly and a little was a defect of the communication system because of how he re-chewed and popularized his thinking. Therefore, the substance does not change much. Take note with some regret. Because the 1982 World Champion is an educated person and so far he had not made any serious slip. But those words of his cannot pass to the cavalry.
They have been designed, they express a probably shared sentiment and perhaps also a vast common sense, they have finally been expressed to the microphones of Irpinia Tv. Perhaps they have also been in other contexts where we speak freely, without fear that others will denounce what is said. So they should be taken seriously despite the presentation of a public apology..
So Cabrini said that if Maradona had gone to Juventus instead of Napoli, he would have won more in the first place. A highly questionable but basically harmless opinion, like superfluous talk. It limits itself to saying that in the period that Maradona spent in Naples (from the 1984-85 season to the 1990-91 season), Naples won 2 league titles. That they are not few, and in any case they are one of those that Juventus won in that same period of time. But the most unpleasant part is the one where Cabrini argued that if Maradona had landed in Turin instead of Naples, he would still be alive..
An inadmissible and very offensive opinion towards Naples, the Neapolitans and Maradona himself. Above all, presumptuous in trying to fully capture the deep love between the champion and the city. A visceral and sick love? Maybe, but also many loves. They are born like this and it could not be otherwise, and perhaps they end up tumultuously. What is there to stigmatize in this? And how do you say that another love would have been better? In addition, arguing that Juventus would have “protected her with a more cushioned environment” In addition to being an unsubstantiated claim because it lacks counter-evidence, it means feeding fairly hackneyed stereotypes about the moral superiority of some societies over others. Better to avoid taking the speech on this ground. Today more than ever.
@pippoevai
[ad_2]
